2010/1/21 Shelby Moore <[email protected]> > So in short I guess (and don't judge me please, because I am still > learning and open-minded) I am saying that I don't want the full feature > sets of Perl, Python, PHP, Java, C#, etc.. Haskel's OOP model is > mathematically preferable.
Haskell doesn't have an OOP model. It is a (militantly) pure *functional*programming language. Type classes are not classes in the OOP sense. > Seems to me that the interoperability of at the common data type layer of > NekoVM could be modified seamlessly to reach into binary compatibility > with native C, with 20% effort. But that needs more study. > This presupposes that compatibility with the C virus is a desirable trait, doesn't it?
-- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
