Federal Manager's Daily Report: Monday, October 25, 2004

FEDweek is the largest information resource in the federal
government with now over one million weekly readers.
To Subscribe, Go to http://www.fedweek.com/subscribepopup.htm
***********************************************************
Valued Added Service to Our Readers:

Federal Job Search
http://www.fedweek.com/Jobs/default.asp   

Job Bulletin Board
http://www.fedweek.com/Jobs/default.asp      

Unlimited Internet Access for as low as $10.90
http://fedweek.sparklist.com/t/294966894/821889/148/0/  

Our Readers Will Get Special Discounted Travel Rates
Including, Airfare, Hotels, RV's, Car Rentals, and 
Special Weekend Getaways--Anywhere in the world 
http://fedweek.sparklist.com/t/294966894/821889/339/0/  

**********************************************************
In This Week's Issue
1. Whistleblower Bill Hits Hangup
2. Report Faults TSA Contractor Performance Evaluation
3. Report Recommends New Evaluation Criteria, 'True' Screener Pilot Program 
4. Brand New Federal Employees Legal Survival Guide Just Published
New Publication Announcement: The Federal Employees 
Legal Survival Guide http://fedweek.sparklist.com/t/294966894/821889/338/0/ 
************************************************************

1. Whistleblower Bill Hits Hangup
Legislation to increase rights of federal whistleblowers that had been on a 
fast track for approval before Congress adjourns for this year has hit a snag 
that makes its chances for passage questionable, officials say.

The whistleblower bills (HR-3281 and S-2628) are ready for House and 
Senate floor voting after compromises were reached on several provisions
 that had been troublesome. In general, the measures seek to broaden the
types of disclosures that are deemed protected under whistleblower law from
workplace retaliation. In sum, the measures would overturn several decisions 
by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that have had the effect 
of denying whistleblower protections in certain situations.

House and Senate leaders had been hoping to reach a quick agreement on the 
remaining main point of difference: language in the Senate bill, but not the 
House bill, that would allow whistleblowers to appeal decisions against them
 by the Merit Systems Protection Board to the federal court of appeals where 
they live, and not just to the Federal Circuit, which sponsors view as 
anti-whistleblower. However, that plan has been put on hold because of 
Justice Department objections to certain provisions in the bill, official say,
 and it's uncertain whether the issues can be resolved during the post-election 
lame-duck session. 

2. Report Faults TSA Contractor Performance Evaluation
The Transportation Security Administration lacks "consistent 
performance standards" for evaluating private screener performance, 
or comparing it to the performance of federal screeners, a new 
report from the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector 
General has said. 

It faulted the lack of a central point of authority for making policy 
decisions and providing guidance to the local TSA officials charged 
with managing and overseeing its screener pilot programs, and 
alleged that requests from the local officials are often passed around 
within headquarters rather than being dealt with. 

As a result, "the four pilot program contractors interpreted program 
guidelines differently or received different guidance from TSA on 
similar issues, leading to inconsistencies in operations among the
 pilot program contractors and making comparisons among them
difficult," according to the report. 

It said TSA relies on airport FSD to monitor the programs and report 
on "unusual contractor practices," and that headquarters is more 
focused on developing policy on hiring and training -- and that such a
 management structure fails to acknowledge operational differences
occurring within the pilot program airports, said the report. 

While some TSA airport officials did not bother contacting 
headquarters to make decisions, others expressed frustration at the 
lack of response from headquarters or inaccurate guidance, said the IG. 

However, one unnamed TSA official said the lack of response was 
partly due to high turnover in the contracting officer and program
manager positions, and noted that those "positions have stabilized 
and recent improvements have been made to the program to improve 
efficiency and oversight."

The IG also found that TSA failed to establish contract performance 
evaluation plans -- as required under the contracts -- 10 days prior to 
the start of the first evaluation period.

According to the report, the plans were supposed to have included
criteria to evaluate performance areas and identify the percentage of 
award fees for them. However, it said TSA evaluated contract 
performance using the objectives within each contract's work
statement, which were based on contractor proposals -- only one of 
which had "measurable performance criteria."

3. Report Recommends New Evaluation Criteria, 'True' Screener 
Pilot Program 
TSA needs "measurable criteria to compare and evaluate the 
performance of both contractor and federal screening operations, 
said the report. 

TSA management said that in September 2003, the "performance 
evaluation plan" was incorporated into each contract, covering 
operational, technical, management, leadership, contract-management 
and human resources criteria to evaluate contractor performance. 

According the IG, TSA issued measurements for evaluating contractor 
performance in September 2003, but did not address the requirement to 
develop criteria to compare contractors to federal screeners, something 
that it has started doing with initiatives such as its Bearing Point study. 

The report further recommended that TSA establish a "true passenger 
and baggage screening pilot program that allows greater flexibility for 
both contractor and federally staffed airports to test innovations and 
new approaches in hiring, training, and managing screeners."

TSA managers responded by saying that TSA formed a leadership
team to address those issues and to provide HR flexibility, such as
granting the contractors the authority to do their own recruiting
 staffing and scheduling.

5. Brand New Federal Employees Legal Survival Guide Just Published
New Publication Announcement: The Federal Employees 
Legal Survival Guide http://fedweek.sparklist.com/t/294966894/821889/338/0/ 
Passman & Kaplan announces the October 2004 publication of 
the SECOND EDITION of the Federal Employees Legal Survival 
Guide. This comprehensive book, first published by Passman 
& Kaplan in 1999, has been called the definitive how-to 
guide for enforcing the rights of federal employees. 

The second edition of the Guide includes 100 PAGES OF 
ADDITIONAL NEW MATERIAL (now 616 total pages) and useful 
advice. New features include information on internet 
legal research, preparing for and conducting a hearing, 
sample discovery requests, and up-to-date contact 
information for federal personnel agencies. The Guide 
also includes a listing of frequently used civil service 
acronyms and practical appendices of sample forms, 
charts illustrating appeal rights, and commonly-needed 
deadlines. 

As with the first edition of the Guide, Passman & Kaplan 
has attempted to move away from the "legalese" which so 
often complicates an already-bewildering array of 
regulations and policies. Although the Federal Employees 
Legal Survival Guide, Second Edition is clearly an 
invaluable resource for practioners, Passman & Kaplan has 
maintained its commitment to target the book to the 
average federal employee. 

***********************************************************
To place your order for The Federal Employees Legal Survival 
Guide just go to http://fedweek.sparklist.com/t/294966894/821889/338/0/ and place 
your secure order online. The cost of this 
publication is only $49.95 Plus $6 s&h--Remember, this is 
a 616 page reference that is chalked full of invaluable 
information that every federal manager must have!

Or you can mail your order with payment of $55.95 to 
FEDweek, PO Box 5519, Glen Allen, VA 23058.

This is a one of a kind book you can't afford to be without!
************************************************************


FEDweek 
11541 Nuckols Rd. Suite D
Glen Allen, VA 23059
(804) 288-5321
Website: http://www.fedweek.com



[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are subscribed to federalmanagersdailyreport as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to