NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: GIBBS & BRADNER 11/23/04 Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
In this issue: * Net Insider columnist Scott Bradner discusses the FCC's ruling ��on VoIP services * Links related to Gibbs & Bradner * Featured reader resource _______________________________________________________________ This newsletter is sponsored by SBC Gimme Shelter! Converged Services Spell Relief For Beleaguered Network Managers Switched IP networks are rapidly becoming the corporate communications architecture of choice. By converging voice, data and video onto IP telephony platforms and Virtual Private Networks, enterprises can supply bandwidth when and where end users need it, while significantly lowering administrative and equipment costs. Click here to download this Whitepaper now http://www.fattail.com/redir/redirect.asp?CID=88625 _______________________________________________________________ NW'S RESEARCH CENTER ON SPAM Go to NW's Research Center on spam and find our in-depth review of 16 anti-spam products, our spam calculator to determine how much spam is costing your enterprise each year, the latest spam news, advice on how to fight spam and more. For the latest on spam click here: http://www.fattail.com/redir/redirect.asp?CID=88661 _______________________________________________________________ Today's focus: Compartmentalizing the Internet By Scott Bradner The FCC earlier this month ruled that VoIP services generally cross state borders ( <http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/111504voip.html> ) and, even in the cases where they do not, it is often impossible to tell. Gee, what a revelation! Of course this has been clear for quite a while to anyone who actually thought about it for more than a few nanoseconds. But the FCC ruling was required to keep state regulators from ignoring this reality in their quest to "protect the public" and, in a total coincidence I assume, raise state revenue. Even though it's correct in exempting VoIP from state regulation, the FCC's opinion might come back to haunt it. On Nov. 9, the FCC adopted a Memorandum Opinion and Order on VoIP service provider Vonage's petition ( <http://www.nwfusion.com/nlgibrad853> ) for a declaratory ruling requesting that the FCC pre-empt an order from the Minnesota utility commission imposing traditional telephone service regulations on VoIP services. I wrote about the Minnesota order shortly after it happened ( <http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2003/0825bradner.html> ) and mused about the usefulness of regulators in light of such orders ( <http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2003/1027bradner.html> ). So I will not repeat those points now. The FCC's new order noted that state regulation, both in the telecom market and in general for commerce, was only valid for services confined within a state. It's clear that VoIP services, like those offered by Vonage, cannot generally be seen as being limited to in-state, and the FCC order detailed a number of reasons that it was not feasible for a service provider to know if a particular call originated and terminated in one state. The reasons included that Vonage users can transport their equipment anywhere and still use it to place or receive calls and that Vonage offers customers the ability to use what appear to be local phone numbers from, let's say New York City, anyplace they want to, such as Minneapolis. The FCC recognized that the Minnesota order dealt with many important issues that needed to be resolved and said that the FCC would address some of these in its forthcoming overall IP-enabled services rules. One of those issues is Enhanced 911 (E911). The IETF is investigating aspects of the E911-over-the-Internet problem and may develop recommendations and standards in the next year or two (See the Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit <http://www.ietf.org/ietf/04nov/ecrit.txt> ) BOF, the Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/geopriv-charter.html> ) working group and work in the SIP ( <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/sip-charter.html> ) and SIPPING ( <http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/sipping-charter.html> ) working groups). The FCC might come to rue the day that it made many of the arguments in this order because the same arguments can be very easily made to say that VoIP (and most Internet) regulation should not be a national issue. Just like calling a help desk for many American companies rings a phone halfway around the world in India there is no way to be sure that the VoIP phone that rings when you call a number in the 212 area code is in the U.S. Disclaimer: Because it's hard to outsource teaching in a residential university I don't think Harvard has a direct opinion on the trend, but I didn't ask and the above observations are my own. _______________________________________________________________ To contact: Scott Bradner Bradner is a consultant with Harvard University's University Information Systems. He can be reached at <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________________________ This newsletter is sponsored by SBC Gimme Shelter! Converged Services Spell Relief For Beleaguered Network Managers Switched IP networks are rapidly becoming the corporate communications architecture of choice. By converging voice, data and video onto IP telephony platforms and Virtual Private Networks, enterprises can supply bandwidth when and where end users need it, while significantly lowering administrative and equipment costs. Click here to download this Whitepaper now http://www.fattail.com/redir/redirect.asp?CID=88624 _______________________________________________________________ ARCHIVE LINKS Gibbs archive: http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/gibbs.html Bradner archive: http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/bradner.html _______________________________________________________________ Voice over IP is penetrating the corporate market Is your company a candidate for Voice over IP? What kind of return on investment can you expect to see? Tune in to find out. Go now. http://www.fattail.com/redir/redirect.asp?CID=88549 _______________________________________________________________ FEATURED READER RESOURCE NW FUSION PARTNERS' SITES NOW AVAILABLE Network World Fusion Partners is a collaborative effort between Network World and sponsoring Partner companies. Each microsite contains best-of-breed information as well as custom content not found anywhere else, including a custom email newsletter and special offers. It is current, top-of-mind information that is readily accessible and bundled into one comprehensive package. Visit the NWFusion Partner sites to learn about storage solutions, network access solutions, optical networking and more. Visit NWFusion Partners at: <http://www.nwfusion.com/go/nwprr> _______________________________________________________________ May We Send You a Free Print Subscription? You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply today at <http://www.subscribenw.com/nl2> International subscribers click here: <http://nww1.com/go/circ_promo.html> _______________________________________________________________ SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters, go to: <http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/Changes.aspx> To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to: <http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/Preferences.aspx> To change your e-mail address, go to: <http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ChangeMail.aspx> Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to this message. This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please use this address when modifying your subscription. _______________________________________________________________ Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Inquiries to: NL Customer Service, Network World, Inc., 118 Turnpike Road, Southborough, MA 01772 For advertising information, write Kevin Normandeau, V.P. of Online Development, at: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copyright Network World, Inc., 2004 ------------------------ This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
