Hi Andres,
You mean to say that join is more efficient ?
Thanks.
Andr�s Sarcevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andr�s Sarcevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think join is quite performant than "for all entries".----- Original Message -----From: babu kSent: Friday, December 03, 2004 3:39 PMSubject: [ABAP] Join TablesHi,I want to know what is the criteria for using join on tables. for example for selecting data from header and detail tables we can use "FOR ALL ENTRIES" after the first selection, so why do we use Join on tables ?Thanks - Babu
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a to mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP
Comments about the list can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, send a to mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP
Comments about the list can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a to mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP
Comments about the list can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
