Hi Andres,
You mean to say that join is more efficient ?
Thanks.

Andr�s Sarcevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think join is quite performant than "for all entries".
----- Original Message -----
From: babu k
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 3:39 PM
Subject: [ABAP] Join Tables

Hi,
 
I want to know what is the criteria for using join on tables. for example for selecting data from header and detail tables we can use "FOR ALL ENTRIES" after the first selection, so why do we use Join on tables ?
 
Thanks - Babu


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a to mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP

Comments about the list can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





To unsubscribe from this list, send a to mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP

Comments about the list can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. Learn more.

To unsubscribe from this list, send a to mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ABAP

Comments about the list can be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here
Web Bug from http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=298184.5639630.6699735.3001176/D=groups/S=:HM/A=2434971/rand=580217082


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to