* * * * * * * * * * * * REMINDER * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
On the days that I don't publish, like today, you will
receive Bill Bonner's DAILY RECKONING. This will help you
to keep pace with the changes in the markets.  Bonner and
I agree on most things in the field of economics, so the
two letters will reinforce each other.
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Fabulous Destiny of Alan Greenspan

The Daily Reckoning

London, England

Friday, December 03, 2004

---------------------

*** Ain't nothin' gonna break our stride... 

*** The jobs numbers are in... bond traders rejoice... 

*** Reflecting on Japan... natural disasters... living
frugal - and loving it... and more!

---------------------
You are receiving this email as a part of your FREE
Subscription to The Daily Reckoning. Should you wish to
unsubscribe please follow the instructions at the bottom of 
this email.
---------------------

No word from Bill this morning. We looked for him in London 
and Paris and even Baltimore too, but to no avail. 
 
No matter, we move swiftly on... 
 
This morning, we found the latest payroll data waiting for
us when we tuned into CNBC. 112,000 new jobs were added,
says the Labor Department, about half the number economists 
had predicted, and the slowest gain in five months.
 
Stocks shrugged and then rallied, but bond traders
rejoiced. The yield on the 10-year note is nearly 16 points 
lower this morning. Gold is also strong, and is up over $5. 
With only 26 minutes of trading remaining in the metal
pits, our favorite yellow metal looks like it might close
the week above $455. 
 
Hoo-rah!
 
Here's more news from Eric, with an unofficial survey on
the state of the nation's housing market!

--------------

Eric Fry, reporting from New York City... 

"It goes like this: the housing market is in a bubble of
sorts, but one that accelerating inflation will gently
deflate. In other words, most of us homeowners will barely
notice the demise of the bubble because the NOMINAL value
of our houses will not drop. Indeed, they might even
continue rising." 

For the rest of this must-read issue of The Rude Awakening, 
click here:

Anatomy of a Bubble
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=4316

--------------

Back in Baltimore:

*** Our old friend, Martin Spring, sends these impressions
from his recent trip to Japan:

"Our visit to Japan proved to be a stimulating
experience...  in more ways than one.

"As we lay on the tatami in Japanese traditional
accommodation in Hakone, a typhoon swept over us. Two days
later our hotel bedroom in Tokyo on the 28th floor vibrated 
from the spreading shock waves of the worst earthquake to
hit the country in ten years. More than a hundred people
died in the two natural disasters, with even one of the
"bullet" trains we used to travel around the country being
derailed for the first time in their 40-year history.

"However, our abiding impression of Japan is not of
disasters, but of a nation that remains immensely strong,
socially and economically.

"The social breakdown that is slowly destroying the quality 
of life in Britain and elsewhere in Europe is completely
absent. The 'old-fashioned' virtues, such as respect for
others, willingness to work hard for long hours, and
loyalty to family, group and nation, remain pre-eminent.

"Because the woes of its financial system are paraded
endlessly in global financial media, it's easy to forget
how strong this economy remains. Japanese enjoy incomes
significantly higher than the citizens of Western Europe,
and their prosperity is 'in your face' when you visit their 
vibrant cities. Although their quality of life has some
well-known deficiencies, such as tiny homes, it also boasts 
favorable features, such as excellent educational, medical
and public services, while the range and quality of the
goods on display in its stores is a wonder to behold.

"Dazzled by China's current emergence as a major economic
power, it's easy to forget that the Japanese economy is
three times its size. And, being both far more advanced
technologically and managerially, and conveniently located
in the region, it seems certain to be a major beneficiary - 
perhaps the biggest - of China's future growth. However, in 
contrast to China, which is a huge country whose government 
is a nasty dictatorship lacking legitimacy, Japan is a
stable democracy with sophisticated institutions.

"Although Japan's growth rate in recent years has been even 
poorer than Europe's, I have the impression that enough
things are going right for it to do rather better over the
coming decade. It would be foolish to underestimate the
continuing dynamism of this industrial juggernaut and to
ignore the investment opportunities there. [Ed. Note:
Martin Spring isn't the only one who thinks Japan holds a
plethora of investment opportunities... in today's issue of 
The Daily Pfenning, our very our currency counselor, Chuck
Butler, urges his readers to put their money in one of the
currencies from the "tremendous trio: Japan, Thailand or
Singapore." For more on this story, see here:

Hitting the Wall
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=4315

*** A Daily Reckoning reader writes:

I must be a bit of a freak; I have managed for several
months to live comfortably (though certainly not
frivolously) on the combined income from a small pension
and my Social Security, which total $1775/month. I own a
very nice, small condo with a mortgage balance of just over 
$31,000 and a current market value of about $180,000. I've
handled my stock investments rather poorly, and have less
than $40,000 left in various funds. My credit cards are
paid up to date, though Christmas may put a bit of a dent
in that.

I eat out very rarely, and don't entertain at home, but I
have good friends whom I cherish, to say nothing of my two
adult children and four grandchildren. I have more to read
than I have time for, and lately have been spending a lot
of time sorting and getting rid of the mountains of paper
that clutter the place.

I am in the process of retiring from my career in real
estate sales (which I have let go defunct this year anyway) 
and will save quite a bit from dues and other fees I won't
pay any more.

The only reason I can give for being perfectly happy on so
little money is that I was born in 1937 and grew up with
very little. When I was five years old, my parents started
giving me a weekly allowance, of which 10 cents was for
Sunday school, 10 cents for War Bonds, and 5 cents to spend 
or save. We didn't have a lot of "stuff" at our house -
probably because first there was no money and then there
was nothing much available to buy. My kids have more income 
but thank goodness they also live simply.

I'm not sure why I decided to bore you with all this,
except perhaps to let you know that there still are a few
of us who live frugally and enjoy it. 

--- Advertisement ---

Inherit $3.5 Billion Worth of America's Most Attractive
Real Estate...  And Get Paid for Owning It

For less than $30, YOU can be just like a real estate
tycoon -- and own some of the most attractive 
properties in America.  But unlike a tycoon, you'll never
have to visit it...  manage it...  or even 
pay property taxes on it.  Best of all, you could multiply
your money by as much as five times over 
the years ahead -- while adding rental income to your
portfolio!

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/FST/catB03   

---------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: A Daily Reckoning Classique
originally broadcast on December 3, 2002, which proves the
ol' French adage: plus �a change, plus c'est la m�me chose
- the more things change, the more they stay the same.

THE FABULOUS DESTINY OF ALAN GREENSPAN
by Bill Bonner 

This week marks an important anniversary. 

"How do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly
escalated asset values, which then become subject to
unexpected and prolonged contractions, as they have in
Japan over the past decade?" asked the Fed chairman, when
he was still mortal. The occasion was a black-tie dinner at 
the American Enterprise Institute in December - five years
ago. 

"We as central bankers," Greenspan continued, "need not be
concerned if a collapsing financial asset bubble does not
threaten to impair the real economy, its production, jobs,
and price stability. But we should not underestimate or
become complacent about the complexity of the interactions
of the asset markets and the economy. Thus, evaluating
shifts in balance sheets generally, and in asset prices
particularly, must be an integral part of the development
of monetary policy." 

Mortals make mistakes. But Greenspan was right on target in 
'96. It was later, after he became a demi-god, the
"Maestro," that the Fed chief erred. 

In 1996, the bear market of '73-74 and the crash of '87
were still functioning as caution signs. Greenspan spoke on 
the evening of the 5th. On the morning of the 6th, markets
reacted. Investors in Tokyo panicked... giving the Nikkei
Dow a 3% loss for the day, its biggest drop of the year.
Hong Kong fell almost 3%. Frankfurt 4%. London 2%. But by
the time the sun rose in New York, where the Fed chairman
was better known, investors had decided not to care. After
a steep drop in the first half-hour, as overnight sell
orders were executed, the market began a rebound and never
looked back. By the spring of the year 2,000, the Dow had
almost doubled from the level that had so concerned the Fed 
chairman. 

But while the maestro was alarmed at Dow 6,437, he was
serene at Dow 11,722. Fatal to Greenspan's judgment was a
combination of bad information, bad theory and a human
nature that - though unchanged for many millennia - seems
to have slipped the attention of central bankers. 

Greenspan's theory was that by carefully controlling the
cost of credit and the money supply he could avoid serious
economic downturns. You have suffered enough discussion of
this issue here in the Daily Reckoning, dear reader. For
today's purpose, we will just point out that Mr. Greenspan
has everything he needs to get the economy back on track,
except the essentials. He cannot make telecom debt worth
what people paid for it. He can't restock consumers'
savings accounts. He can't make Enron a good business. He
can't erase excess capacity, nor make investment losses
disappear. 

In addition to the bad theory, Mr. Greenspan had bad
information. The "information age" brought more information 
to more people - including to central bankers... but the
more information people had, the more opportunity they had
to choose the misinformation that suited their purposes. 

Since the late '90s, however, many of the figures used to
justify the New Economy have been revised, downward. "The
government previously decided that neither corporate
profits nor productivity improvements were nearly as good
as they appeared to be in 1999 and 2000," reports Floyd
Norris in the New York Times. "And now the industrial
production numbers have been sharply revised downward." 

"The new numbers show industrial production was
dramatically overestimated, particularly in the high-
technology area," Norris quotes John Vail, the chief
strategist of Fuji Futures, a financial futures firm in
Chicago. 

What was true for the nation's financial performance was
also true for that of individual companies. Companies
engineered their financial reports to give investors the
information they wanted to hear - that they earned one
penny more per share than anticipated. But what they were
often doing was exactly what Alan Greenspan worried about - 
impairing balance sheets in order to produce growth and
earnings numbers that delighted Wall Street. Curiously,
during what was supposed to be the greatest economic boom
in history, the financial condition of many major companies 
- such as Enron and IBM - actually deteriorated. 

But by 1998, Alan Greenspan no longer noticed; he had
become irrationally exuberant himself. Markets make
opinions, as they say on Wall Street. The Fed chairman's
opinion soon caught up with the bull market in equities. As 
Benjamin Graham wrote of the '49-'66 bull market: "It
created a natural satisfaction on Wall Street with such
fine achievements and a quite illogical and dangerous
conviction that equally marvelous results could be expected 
for common stocks in the future." 

Shares rise, as Buffett put it, first for the right
reasons, and then for the wrong ones. Shares were cheap in
'82... the Dow rose 550% over the next 14 years. Then, by
the time Greenspan warned of "irrational exuberance",
shares were no longer cheap. But by then, no one cared.
Benjamin Graham's giant "voting machine" of Wall Street
cast its ballots for slick shares with go-go technology and 
can-do management. Shares rose further; and people became
more and more sure that they would continue to rise. 

"Greenspan will never allow the economy to fall into
recession," said analysts. "The Fed will always step in to
avoid a really bad bear market," said investors. Over the
long term, there was no longer any risk from owning shares, 
they said. And even Alan Greenspan seemed to believe it. If 
the Fed chairman believed it, who could doubt it was true?
And the more true it seemed, the more exuberant people
became. 

"What happened in the 1990s," says Robert Shiller, author
of the book Irrational Exuberance, "is that people really
believed that we were going into a new era and were willing 
to take risks rational people would not take... people did
not feel they had to save. They spent heavily because they
thought the future was riskless." 

But risk - like value - has a way of mounting up, even
while it seems to disappear. The more infallible Alan
Greenspan appeared... the more "unduly escalated" asset
values became. Having warned of a modest "irrational
exuberance," the maestro created a greater one. 

Regards, 

Bill Bonner 
The Daily Reckoning

Editor's Note: Bill Bonner is the founder and editor of The 
Daily Reckoning. He is also the author, with Addison
Wiggin, of The Wall Street Journal best seller Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of the 21st
Century (John Wiley & Sons).

The Best Investment Book I've Ever Read!
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/RCKN/FDR

--- Advertisement ---

The Biggest Breakthrough in Medicine in 20 Years!

On Nov. 24, 2003, we recommended a small, innovative
company for $13.91 a share. Right now, it is trading for
over $26 a pop. And it could soon rise 288% more - thanks 
to what could be one of the biggest medical breakthroughs
in the last 20 years. Find out how to secure your share of
the profits now. Click here:

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/VPI/288A13   

------------------------------------------------------

MAKE YOUR OPINIONS COUNT! Visit our Discussion Board at
http://www.agora-inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3
and submit your views or read what others are saying.
Our writers and contributors also welcome your questions
and comments. Simply reply with the word 'Question' or
'Comment' in the Subject of your e-mail.

------------------------------------------------------

If you'd like, please e-mail this issue of the Daily
Reckoning to a friend:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/emailfriend.cfm?id=10940

------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESS CHANGE? WISH TO CANCEL? You can administer your
account online. Simply go to Subscriber Services at:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/subsvcs.cfm

------------------------------------------------------


*******
Please note: We sent this e-mail to: 
      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
because you subscribed to this service.

*******
To manage your e-mail subscription, use our web interface at:
    http://www.agoramail.net/Home.cfm?List=RealityC
To cancel or for any other subscription issues, write us at:
    Order Processing Center
    Attn: Customer Service
    P.O. Box 925
    Frederick, MD 21705 USA

*******
Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice.
Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions,
they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular
investment situation.  No communication by our employees to you should be
deemed as personalized investment advice.

We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any
security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must
wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of
printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation.
Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after
consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the
prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Reply via email to