December 6, 2004

In This Issue...

  • Pro Oxidants -- When It Comes to Cholesterol, Oxidants Are Not All Bad
  • Hazardous Vitamins and Dosages that Can Damage Your Health
  • The Politics of Dairy -- Whose recommendation is it in the new Food Pyramid?
  • Get an Interest-Free Loan from the IRS!

PRO OXIDANTS

For a long time, we have believed that antioxidants are all good and that oxidants, also called free radicals, are all bad because they contribute to a wide range of internal problems, including major diseases. However, in Daily Health News, November 15, 2004, I wrote about the connection between oxidants and diabetes -- scientists are discovering that the picture is much more complex after all and that oxidants do serve a purpose in the human body.

Scientists at New York University School of Medicine have published a report on a study that demonstrates oxidants' role in keeping LDL ("bad") cholesterol at lower levels. The doctor who led the NYU study is Edward A. Fisher, MD, PhD, professor of cardiovascular medicine and cell biology. I spoke with him about this study and its implications.

THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE STUDY

To create LDL, the liver must have a protein called Apo B-100. However, the presence of a type of oxidant called lipid peroxide reduces availability of Apo B-100 to the liver. With less Apo B-100 available to it, the liver can produce only a limited amount of LDL. The fortunate result is that lower levels of LDL cholesterol venture forth into the bloodstream. Again, an oxidant acts as a signal, informing the liver to decrease LDL production.

THE RESEARCH

To determine how an antioxidant would affect this process, the investigators introduced a high level of vitamin E to the mice liver cells. Once there, the E did its job by attaching to the oxidant, leaving the liver free to create LDL. Result: LDL blood levels rose. Even though this study was done on mice, Dr. Fisher says that it is in line with a previous heart study that proved human subjects taking antioxidants ended up with slightly higher LDL levels than those who were not taking them. Dr. Fisher says this study has caused him and his colleagues to rethink even the way they refer to oxidants in the body. Before the study, they described the presence of oxidants as "oxidative stress." Now they are considering calling it "oxidant signaling."

Although these studies support the idea of oxidants' usefulness, Dr. Fisher emphasizes that it's not yet time to sing the praises of oxidants. He describes the value of oxidants in the body with the old real estate saying -- location, location, location. In other words, the same oxidative reaction can be beneficial in one place but destructive in another.

For example, I wrote some months ago about a large observational study that showed a dramatic reduction in the onset of Alzheimer's disease for people who took vitamins E and C in tandem. But as we have just seen, vitamin E in the liver can allow for production of excess LDL. Daily Health News contributing editor Andrew L. Rubman, ND, notes that this study examined the effects of adding just vitamin E, rather than adding it as a component of broad-based antioxidant intervention. Balance is critical throughout the body.

WHAT SHOULD YOU DO ABOUT IT?

In the meantime, there are thousands, maybe millions, of people who include antioxidants in their diet and supplement with them. Dr. Fisher reports that although he can't make a correlation between the quantity of vitamin E they gave the mice in the study and the amount humans typically consume, he says that the quantity given to the mice was very high. Consequently, his concern centers on the megadoses of antioxidants that some people choose to take. His advice is to avoid such megadoses, but he says that if your LDL levels are in the acceptable range (below 100 mg/dl for people who are not in the high-risk group for cardiac disease) and you're taking 400 IU of vitamin E each day, there is no reason to stop. People who have higher LDL levels, however, should discuss these findings with their doctor to decide if an adjustment to their antioxidant intake should be made. In a future article, we will examine a late-breaking study associating vitamin E supplementation with cardiac problems.

Bottom line: The vitamin E studies suggest using caution against excessive single antioxidant supplementation... and a further reason not to self-medicate -- but to speak with a professional instead.


HAZARDOUS VITAMINS AND DOSAGES THAT CAN DAMAGE YOUR HEALTH

Vitamins can do a lot of good -- but, as with everything, taken improperly they can cause harm. Taken in the wrong quantities, certain common vitamins often can do far more harm than good. They can leave you with a chronic health condition... or even contribute to deadly disease. That's why the latest edition of the two-million copy best seller THE BIG BLACK BOOK is going public with these "dirty little vitamin secrets" the manufacturers don't want you to know. We even have included a complete list of the hazardous vitamins and dosages that can damage your health.

Read on...


THE POLITICS OF DAIRY

The Food Pyramid -- our government's nutrition guide and the darling of school teachers and lunchrooms -- is under renovation, as I discussed in Daily Health News, January 29, 2004. The revised pyramid is due shortly with a surprising recommendation: Increase dairy intake for people ages 19 to 50 -- from two servings a day to three. Think of the huge implications this has for the US dairy industry. Given that some nutritionists challenge the health benefits of any dairy consumption, it begs the question of whether this recommendation is truly motivated by health benefits or politics.

NUTRITIONISTS SPEAK OUT

In interviews, Walter Willet, MD, DrPH, of Harvard's School of Public Health, has said that he worries about people upping their intake of fat-loaded whole milk and the resulting surge of cardiac disease. He also points to such studies as the ongoing Nurses Health Study, which indicate that the calcium in milk doesn't help ward off osteoporosis, and to other studies that link dairy consumption to an elevated risk of prostate cancer. Milk allergies and sensitivities also are an issue -- for instance, an estimated 75% of black Americans and 95% of Asian Americans are unable to digest proteins in dairy and react badly, with cramps, bloating and diarrhea. Given the controversy surrounding dairy's healthful benefits, you can't help but wonder if this new recommendation reflects the pressure of the powerful dairy industry.

To add fuel to the political fire, although traditionally the emphasis on drinking milk is for its calcium, a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, the group that determines the government's position on nutrition, was quoted in The Wall Street Journal as saying the primary reason for upping the dairy recommendation had to do with potassium, not calcium. (The Institute of Medicine recently advocated increased potassium intake.) Here's the catch: Potassium is plentiful in many foods, not just milk. You can get potassium by eating bananas, winter squash, potatoes, spinach, avocado, oranges and many more fruits and vegetables... and even bitter chocolate.

THE LOW-DOWN ON DAIRY

Is there value in the dairy recommendation at all? According to Ron Schmid, ND, author of The Untold Story of Milk: Green Pastures, Contented Cows and Raw Dairy Foods, there absolutely is value in consuming dairy, with one critical qualification: The dairy must be raw milk from grass-fed cows. According to Dr. Schmid, it is not the milk but the processing of it that has created the health problems. (See Daily Health News, June 30, 2003 and Daily Health News, July 1, 2003.) Raw milk from grass-fed cows is free of these problems, he says, yet full of calcium and a bounty of other nutrients, including vitamins A and D. It is possible to purchase raw milk in 35 states, on the farms where it is produced. In two states, California and Connecticut, you can find it in a few retail markets. He also reports that black Americans in his practice have no problems with raw dairy products, a further indication that processed milk has gone astray.

If you still don't want to consume dairy -- whether raw or processed -- don't worry. There are many ways to get calcium, including dark green leafy vegetables, calcium-fortified orange juice and cereals, broccoli, almonds and, of course, calcium supplements. Just be sure your calcium supplement includes a ratio of 2:1 to 1.5:1 of calcium to magnesium. Supplements should be taken in divided doses to provide better daily absorption.

Be well,


Carole Jackson
Bottom Line's Daily Health News


GET AN INTEREST-FREE LOAN FROM THE IRS!

This is just one of the hundreds of money-making and money-saving strategies that were identified when a group of 26 of the nation's greatest tax experts got together in New York City for a private, closed-door meeting. They all took time out of their busy schedules to get together. Why? Because the information they exchanged at that secret meeting is helping them save fortunes for their clients.

You can find out what else they discussed...

Read on...


Sources...

Pro Oxidants

  • Edward A. Fisher, MD, PhD, professor of cardiovascular medicine and cell biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York City.

The Politics of Dairy



Required Disclaimer: The information provided herein should not be construed as a health-care diagnosis, treatment regimen or any other prescribed health-care advice or instruction. The information is provided with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in the practice of medicine or any other health-care profession and does not enter into a health-care practitioner/patient relationship with its readers. The publisher does not advise or recommend to its readers treatment or action with regard to matters relating to their health or well-being other than to suggest that readers consult appropriate health-care professionals in such matters. No action should be taken based solely on the content of this publication. The information and opinions provided herein are believed to be accurate and sound at the time of publication, based on the best judgment available to the authors. However, readers who rely on information in this publication to replace the advice of health-care professionals, or who fail to consult with health-care professionals, assume all risks of such conduct. The publisher is not responsible for errors or omissions.

Reply via email to