========================================================================
STRATEGIC DEVELOPER: JON UDELL                  http://www.infoworld.com
========================================================================
Thursday, December 16, 2004

THE NETWORK IS THE BLOG

By Jon Udell

Posted December 10, 2004 3:00 PM Pacific Time

Merriam-Webster set the blogosophere buzzing this week with its
announcement that the word "blog" was among the most looked-up words of
the year. The curious hordes were likely puzzled, however, by
Merriam-Webster's definition: "a Web site that contains an online
personal journal with reflections, comments and often hyperlinks."

ADVERTISEMENT
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
THE POWER OF DESIGN, AN INFOWORLD WEBCAST ON MODELING
Did you know that with the power of a model-driven
approach, one can simplify new architectures,
improve development performance, and respond
rapidly to changes across other data models?
Join InfoWorld's CTO, Chad Dickerson, in this
webcast as he explores benefits of
"The Power of Design," sponsored by Sybase.
http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=A77E3E:2B910B2
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Is that all? So what?

When I have given similar definitions myself, they have often provoked
this kind of reaction. Lately, I've realized why. The dictionary
definition of "blog" is correct, but it says nothing about the network
in which the blog participates.

By way of analogy, consider a dictionary definition of a telephone: "an
instrument that converts voice and other sound signals into a form that
can be transmitted to remote locations and that receives and reconverts
waves into sound signals." That's fine if you already know what a
telephone network is, but the definition doesn't work on its own.

Just as telephones are meaningful only when connected to the telephone
network, so blogs are meaningful only when connected to the blog
network. Both are carriers of human communication, but where the
telephone network is essentially fixed -- at least for now, until VoIP
softens its structure -- the blog network is malleable and is shaped by
our use of it. It's more like a nervous system than a computer network,
and for good reason.

The crush of information we process every day creates a terrible
dilemma. On the one hand, we must conserve the scarce resource of
attention. On the other hand, we need to become aware of everything that
matters. It's a tricky balancing act, but one that nature's humblest
creatures have adroitly mastered. The real-time visual processing
performed by insects, as described by Tom Daniel in his PopTech lecture
this fall, is just one example of how efficiently biological systems can
crunch data.

We can't say exactly how the trick is done, but we understand the
basics: a network, a message-passing protocol, nodes that aggregate
inputs and produce outputs. The blog network shares these architectural
properties. Its foundation network is the Web; its protocol is RSS; its
nodes are bloggers. These ingredients combine in ways that are not yet
widely appreciated.

Consider how my own inputs have evolved over the past five years. At one
time, my RSS intake was mostly feeds from conventional published
sources, along with a few from individuals. Now it's the reverse. I
subscribe to people more than to publications, and not because I don't
value the information in those publications -- I do, very much -- but
rather because, outside of the realms in which I'm closely involved, I
can delegate the job of tracking primary sources to people whose
interests and inclinations qualify them to do so.

The blog network is made of people. We are the nodes, actively filtering
and retransmitting knowledge. Clearly this architecture can help manage
the glut of information. More subtly, it can also help ensure that no
vital inputs are suppressed because nobody has to rely on a single
source. If one of the feeds I monitor doesn't react to some event in a
given domain, another probably will. When they all react, I know it was
an especially important event.

The resemblance of this model to the summing of activation potentials in
a neural system is more than superficial. Nature knows best.

Jon Udell is lead analyst at the InfoWorld Test Center.


========================================================================
Because no network is an island, including yours.
Your business depends on your network and the networks
you network with. InfoWorld's "Networking Report"
newsletter summarizes key developments that might affect
your networking plans and performance (and lets you click through for
more). Keep current with what you
need to know about your network and the greater world of
networking that you're part of. Subscribe at
http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=A77E3A:2B910B2

ADVERTISE
========================================================================
For information on advertising, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

UNSUBSCRIBE/MANAGE NEWSLETTERS
========================================================================
To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your e-mail address for any of
InfoWorld's e-mail newsletters, go to:
http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=A77E3B:2B910B2

To subscribe to InfoWorld.com, or InfoWorld Print, or both, or to renew
or correct a problem with any InfoWorld subscription, go to
http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=A77E3D:2B910B2

To view InfoWorld's privacy policy, visit:
http://newsletter.infoworld.com/t?ctl=A77E3C:2B910B2

Copyright (C) 2004 InfoWorld Media Group, 501 Second St., San Francisco,
CA 94107



This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to