On Friday, December 17, 2004, at 9:03:00 AM, Anthony Williams wrote:
>> I took the head /not/ to be another item that understands ->next,
>> and I didn't think I should change that.
> Yes. Both the original code, and yours had a special case for the head
> element, because it wasn't a list node.
> My point is that *head is just a pointer to a node, the same as record->next,
> so if we update this pointer directly, there is no difference, and we don't
> have a special case.
Yes, it was a very neat trick. My brain can't unthread the *'s and
&'s well enough any more. :)
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
Curiosity is more powerful than skepticism.
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
