--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gary Feldman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mohammed Elzubeir wrote:
>
> > proper contract. As it is, I have been having a hard time explaining
> > to my lawyer wht I want.
>
> I don't think "optional" is a word that lawyers feel comfortable
with for contracts, at least not by itself. What are you trying to
accomplish that couldn't be accomplished by merely leaving out the
optional parts entirely, and then doing a separate contract when they
cease being optional?
>
Well, I am quite ignorant when it comes to all this. My end goal is to
have a contract that lays out the foundation for the same concepts
outlined by the "Optional Scope Contracts" document. You can probably
replace optional scope with "incremental functionality" or however a
legal document would want to call it.
I think it's not so much that I know what I want as much as it is that
I know what I do not want. I don't want to promise a client a 'site
that does everything' for X sum of money to be delivered in Z time..
and then go through a long enduring process of re-learning the
requirements.
Regards,
Mohammed Elzubeir
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
