--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ron Jeffries
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 30, 2004, at 6:17:00 AM, bernard_notarianni wrote:
>
> > Let me reformulate what Vincent explains in his post, to help you see
> > the point:
>
> > It happens sometime, on large scale project, that the build breaks,
> > and developpers dont care about it. Experience shows that happen
> > wether it is an XP project or not.
>
> > Vincent propose a very interesting automatic solution (not based on
> > human checking) to avoid this situation, and I would be interested of
> > getting feedback of people who tried to solve this issue.
>
> How will this program solve the problem of people not caring about
> the build being broken?
>
It doesn't! What it does is remove the "problem" in the first place :-)
Let's try to remove all our existing knowledge: if you didn't have to
care about the build, why would you?
What the developer will still need to care about is committing
frequently. This is the important part because this is what is causing
the integration to happen.
-Vincent
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
