comp.lang.ada
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada

Today's most active topics:

* Possible Ada deficiency? - 10 new
  
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b8b8a54001adc4d2

* For the AdaOS folks - 9 new
 
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b95a522100671708

* Private area and child packages - 4 new
 
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/93d7def3eeefbc26

* Another problems of newbie - 3 new
 
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/5ed7b28464be2e1a

* Pointer address - 2 new
 
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/d36fc3985d071e34


Active Topics
-------------

Another problems of newbie - 3 new
----------------------------------
...Just a few hints. After all, you need to learn something. ...I take it you 
are a C/C++ programmer - otherwise you would not create a string wich is one 
char larger then actualy needed. ...for i in word'range loop ...Ada "string" 
is "char []" and "Ada.Strings.Unbounded" is "std::string". And you would not 
use operator + () on a char [], would you? So its: - Fri, Dec 31 2004 8:04 am
3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/5ed7b28464be2e1a


Pointer address - 2 new
-----------------------
The code is for some IPC stuff. I'm trying to pass messages to another MS 
program. You were quite right, I was confused about the address clause. 
Setting the pointer value instead, as I should have, solved the problem. 
Thanks Björn - Fri, Dec 31 2004 1:49 am
2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/d36fc3985d071e34


For the AdaOS folks - 9 new
---------------------------
...So it is about implementations then? But that is not what makes the kernel 
fat. The problem is that OS should have generic interfaces for all kinds of 
devices. They should be in. You can try to solve it by declaring "everything 
is a file": UNIX (tm), or by doing nothing Windows (tm), but in both cases the
result is pretty same. I think only a native OO design - Fri, Dec 31 2004 11:
03 am
9 messages, 5 authors
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b95a522100671708


Return_By_Reference or Return_By_Copy (GNAT bug?) - 2 new
---------------------------------------------------------
Consider the following version of the Rosen trick. Should A_Type be returned 
by reference or by copy? GNAT 3.15p says: by reference; more recent versions 
of GNAT say: by copy. My understanding is that it should be by reference, 
because it has a component R_Type that is a return_by_reference type (R_Type 
is return_by_reference because the full view is limited - Fri, Dec 31 2004 12:
07 pm
2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/74166d5f7afa0c82


Private area and child packages - 4 new
---------------------------------------
...An ...from ...hidden, ...If ...Something. ...client ...opportunities ...But
then how do I know when the access to the Implementation object goes out of 
scope? It seems to me that I need to either derive from Ada.Finalization.
Limited_Controlled or define Something as a smart pointer to Implementation. -
Fri, Dec 31 2004 9:55 am
4 messages, 2 authors
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/93d7def3eeefbc26


Possible Ada deficiency? - 10 new
---------------------------------
I would like to know if anyone else thinks that the inability to hide private 
information from child packages is a deficiency in Ada95. I am discussing ways
to do this on another thread, (See Private area and child packages), but it 
seems wrong that one has to go through a bunch of machinations to do something
like this. Wouldn't a language - Fri, Dec 31 2004 10:15 am
10 messages, 4 authors
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b8b8a54001adc4d2


ANNOUNCE: XIA 0.60 now available - 1 new
----------------------------------------
Version 0.60 of XIA (XPath In Ada) is now available on the McKae Technologies 
website at [link]. This version of XIA is a beta release that completes the 
initial implementation of the XPath 1.0 specification. Therefore this release 
has sufficient capabilities implemented that one may now consider it for - Fri,
 Dec 31 2004 8:48 pm
1 message, 1 author
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/6d8c85fbc3039c79



==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "comp.lang.ada" group.

To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
visit http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/subscribe

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups-beta.google.com 

Reply via email to