comp.lang.ada http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada
Today's most active topics: * Possible Ada deficiency? - 15 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b8b8a54001adc4d2 * For the AdaOS folks - 2 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b95a522100671708 * cmsg cancel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b2cd71f2953f84bf * cmsg cancel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/6e0328eec1fffa91 * Return_By_Reference or Return_By_Copy (GNAT bug?) - 1 new http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/74166d5f7afa0c82 Active Topics ------------- cmsg cancel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1 new ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please cancel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This article was cancelled by the sysadmin at news.doit.wisc.edu because the article violated UW-madison news posting policies. - Sat, Jan 1 2005 2:27 am 1 message, 1 author http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b2cd71f2953f84bf cmsg cancel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1 new ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please cancel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This article was cancelled by the sysadmin at news.doit.wisc.edu because the article violated UW-madison news posting policies. - Sat, Jan 1 2005 2:52 am 1 message, 1 author http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/6e0328eec1fffa91 Possible Ada deficiency? - 15 new --------------------------------- ...I do not think it is a deficiency. What you want is just C++'s private. Ada's private is like C++'s protected. OK, what is actually the use of C++'s private? It is used to declare implementation-specific members, which cannot be accessed by anyone except the owner, i.e. by the class implementation. But that breaks implementation - Sat, Jan 1 2005 12:43 pm 15 messages, 7 authors http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b8b8a54001adc4d2 For the AdaOS folks - 2 new --------------------------- ...Yes, that is what I meant. ...I agree in principle, but disagree in details, in what are these basic needs. I think that a kind of "protected object" should be provided already by the kernel as a building block. ...[ In general neither 1 nor 2 is right. When we know little and just start to explore a new field of computing, we always start with 1. Then we gather - Sat, Jan 1 2005 1: 53 pm 2 messages, 2 authors http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/b95a522100671708 Return_By_Reference or Return_By_Copy (GNAT bug?) - 1 new --------------------------------------------------------- Hi Randy, ...thanks for confirming. ...I was playing around with return by reference to see if it is possible to get unserialized access to a protected variable using the Rosen trick (it is, see example below, especially the protected object P in package C). Will this be illegal in Ada 2005? All the best, - Sat, Jan 1 2005 11:00 pm 1 message, 1 author http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/browse_thread/thread/74166d5f7afa0c82 ============================================================================== You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "comp.lang.ada" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To change the way you get mail from this group, visit: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/subscribe To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ============================================================================== Google Groups: http://groups-beta.google.com
