try to create a unique constraint on a label and your "id" field.
That will take an lock then to assure unique creation. Michael Am 23.12.2013 um 02:00 schrieb Javad Karabi <[email protected]>: > if i have 2 cypher query posts to neo4j > > "MERGE a:Member( {id: {member_id} })" , member_id: 5 > > "MERGE a:Member( {id: {member_id} })" , member_id: 5 > > with both of these posts occurring simultaneously, is it possible to have 2 > nodes created, instead of just the one? > that is, if the first merge was interrupted halfway though, and had not > completed yet, the second then creates a new one since it doesnt see the > first... > is this something that could potentially happen? > > on a related note, how would i enforce uniqueness on Member(id) ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
