Actually I would, I've been working with REST::Neo4p and the writer of the 
module has been more than helpful and I've found decent results doing my 
inserts now using perl. I'm just in the process of migrating my CREATE 
UNIQUE queries to MERGE to test the performance benefits. Once that's done 
I'll start looking at the application layer (as I'm still loading data, 
there's a lot of it, over 2 million incident nodes and I'm barely half way 
through loading the spreadsheets). Eventually I hope to present my results 
as "normalizing and graphing medical patient data with Neo4j".

Happy New Year

~ icenine

On Wednesday, January 1, 2014 6:36:04 PM UTC, Michael Hunger wrote:
>
> No worries, it's still early in the New Year :)
>
> But you definitely want to write a blog post about what you're doing with 
> Neo4j? Right?
>
> Happy New Year
>
> Michael
>
> Am 01.01.2014 um 19:33 schrieb JDS <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
> Ugh *shame*
>
> Thanks Mike
>
> On Wednesday, January 1, 2014 6:32:16 PM UTC, Michael Hunger wrote:
>>
>> Typo:
>>
>> In query #4 you use "NRLS_DATA_TYPE" in the previous ones you use "
>> NLRS_DATA_TYPE"
>>
>> N_RL_S vs. N_LR_S
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> Am 01.01.2014 um 19:26 schrieb JDS <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong but I thought that all 3 of the top queries would return 
>> data based on the data returned by 1st and 4th query so I'm a little 
>> confused. Server is 2.0.0 enterprise stable.
>>
>> neo4j-sh (?)$ START n=node(*) WHERE HAS (n.code) AND n.code = 'IN05_lvl1' 
>> RETURN n.code;
>> +-------------+
>> | n.code      |
>> +-------------+
>> | "IN05_lvl1" |
>> +-------------+
>> 1 row
>> 102405 ms
>> neo4j-sh (?)$ MATCH (ndt:NLRS_DATA_TYPE) WHERE ndt.code = 'IN05_lvl1' 
>> RETURN ndt.code;        
>> +----------+
>> | ndt.code |
>> +----------+
>> +----------+
>> 0 row
>> 31 ms
>> neo4j-sh (?)$ MATCH (ndt:NLRS_DATA_TYPE { code : 'IN05_lvl1' }) RETURN 
>> ndt.code;              
>> +----------+
>> | ndt.code |
>> +----------+
>> +----------+
>> 0 row
>> 20 ms
>> neo4j-sh (?)$ MATCH (ndt:NRLS_DATA_TYPE) RETURN ndt.code;                 
>>                     
>> +-------------------+
>> | ndt.code          |
>> +-------------------+
>> | "RP07"            |
>> | "IN07"            |
>> | "Age_at_Incident" |
>> | "ST01_LVL1"       |
>> | "PD09"            |
>> | "PD05_lvl1"       |
>> | "IN05_lvl1"       |
>> | "IN03_lvl1"       |
>> | "IN07_01MMYY"     |
>> | "PD11"            |
>> | "IN02_A_01"       |
>> | "IN01"            |
>> | "PD02"            |
>> +-------------------+
>> 13 rows
>> 113 ms
>> neo4j-sh (?)$ MATCH (ndt:NLRS_DATA_TYPE { code : "IN05_lvl1" }) RETURN 
>> ndt.code;
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Neo4j" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to