Hi Alex, I'm especially interested in the theory of this practice.
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:07:11 AM UTC+1, Alex Frieden wrote: > > got a graphgist or console? > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Michael Azerhad > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know what would be a "best" practice to deal with range >> dates. >> >> So, here my use case: >> >> I have a lot of events in my graph, I want to return all events that >> occurred between two dates (format YYYY/MM/DD HH:MM). >> >> Currently, I structured each Event node with a "startAt" indexed property >> and an "endDate" indexed property. >> >> Then, I came across this >> article<http://blog.neo4j.org/2012/02/modeling-multilevel-index-in-neoj4.html,>, >> >> conjuring up that indexes would be too costly for this use case. >> >> If I follow this practice and then remove startAt and endDate from my >> Event nodes, wouldn't it too heavy to add nodes representing each hour and >> each minute, as the example does for year, month and day? Indeed, all >> events would then be attached to a "minute" node. >> >> Thanks a lot, >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > Alexander Frieden > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
