Fantastic!

Thanks!


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Michael Hunger <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sean,
>
> the reference node was removed in Neo4j 2.0 so it shouldn't be a problem.
>
> Otherwise just shut down your db, so that id's will be reused and after
> startup the next created node will get id 0.
>
> Michael
>
> Am 30.01.2014 um 14:58 schrieb Sean Sill <[email protected]>:
>
> Any updates on this particular problem?
>
> On Sunday, June 10, 2012 4:24:21 AM UTC-4, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>>
>> Mat,
>> Could you please raise a feature request for this?
>>
>> Send from mobile.
>> On Jun 8, 2012 8:35 PM, "Mat Tyndall" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> So the solution I wound up going with was to just create a new
>>> database, it was the simplest solution since the db was small.
>>>
>>> The main reason I went with a reset is because with a fresh db all I
>>> can count on is that there's a node 0, indexes and other nodes may or
>>> may not exist.
>>>
>>> I'm all in favor of changes that protect a root/reference node.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the replies,
>>>
>>> -Mat
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 7:38 am, Rick Otten <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > This sounds almost like being able to set ACL's on nodes and
>>> relationships (except without the users and roles bit).
>>> >
>>> > Why not go all the way and mark them for read, update, and delete ?
>>>  Throw in an equivalent to "insert"  to mean you are not allowed to create
>>> a relationship to or from this node.  I can't think of a case where with
>>> only one user you'd ever want to take away 'read' permissions, so that
>>> would be the most basic permission level.
>>> >
>>> > By default node 0 would be read only.  All of the other nodes, unless
>>> otherwise specified would default to read,update,insert,delete.
>>> >
>>> > The biggest issue I could see with this is the performance overhead of
>>> having to check permissions when you are mutating the graph.
>>> >
>>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>> Behalf Of Neil Barnwell
>>> > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:03 AM
>>> > To: [email protected]
>>> > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] I deleted root=node(0) by accident, now what?
>>> >
>>> > It's possibly not my place, but I just wanted to throw my ten-penneth
>>> in.
>>> >
>>> > Rather than adding functionality to the web admin interface, what
>>> about the more general solution of "locked" nodes/relationships? In a fresh
>>> database node 0 would be locked (though locking would generally be opt-in).
>>> Cascading deletes and accidents like the OP described would then throw a
>>> "CannotDeleteLockedObject" exception of some sort.
>>> >
>>> > This idea is borrowed from digital cameras, which often offer this
>>> feature so you don't accidentally delete a favourite shot from your memory
>>> card when trying to free-up space.
>>> >
>>> > HTH.
>>> >
>>> > Neil.
>>> >
>>> > On Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:15:17 AM UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote:
>>> >
>>> > So far we haven't see that issue in production, only in development
>>> but it is better to be safe than sorry.
>>> >
>>> > So can you please add two issues to github.com/neo4j/community<htt
>>> p://github.com/neo4j/community>
>>> > # a confirmation dialog in webadmin for the ref-node
>>> > # configurable option that inhibits deleting the root node
>>> >
>>> > Thanks a lot
>>> >
>>> > Michael
>>> >
>>> > Am 07.06.2012 um 09:07 schrieb TheOutlander:
>>> >
>>> > Can this be an issue in Production where we could delete the root
>>> accidentally in code?? Wonder how many people have faced that problem.
>>> >
>>> > -Nick
>>> >
>>> > On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 12:06:09 AM UTC-7, Michael Hunger wrote:
>>> >
>>> > You're right that's annoying.
>>> >
>>> > I think it would make sense to have a confirmation dialog in webadmin
>>> when deleting node 0.
>>> >
>>> > Can you raise a github issue for that?
>>> >
>>> > Sorry for the extra work. How big is your db and can your recreate it,
>>> or export / import it into another db?
>>> >
>>> > A simple way to do that is just to iterate over all nodes and
>>> relationships and recreate them and their properties.
>>> >
>>> > If you need help for that I can provide you with a tool.
>>> >
>>> > Michael
>>> >
>>> > Am 06.06.2012 um 01:35 schrieb Mat Tyndall:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > So I accidentally deleted node 0 while deleting relationships in the
>>> > > data browser since it defaults to 0 instead of an adjacent node
>>> > > (follow the arrow by default instead?).
>>> >
>>> > > Unfortunately, I used node 0 as the root in my code (node.js) to find
>>> > > everything else. I could create a new root but then I'll have
>>> problems
>>> > > syncing between local and online databases. I could use indexes
>>> > > instead but that still creates annoying initialization problems. It
>>> > > doesn't help that looking up nodes that don't exist is bad with
>>> > > Cypher.
>>> >
>>> > > I know I can fix this, but it seems like a much bigger headache than
>>> > > necessary since there is no way to create a new node(0) or undelete a
>>> > > node.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/Sb2ANlJtLDY/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
Sean Sill
Electronic Systems Consultant/Contractor
Electrical and Computer Engineering Alumni from
Missouri University of Science and Technology(Missouri S&T)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to