I may need to rephrase my sentence, for example we can have a user with userid = 10 in our database, and when we query the database (which is indexed by lucene) for user with userid=10, the database may not find a result for that query. However it actually exists. This is not acceptable for social networks (which is the focus of BG benchmark). I heard about this issue in Lucene indexing service from Prof. Ghandeharizadeh at USC DBLAB. if you wish you can contact him directly.
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:54:46 AM UTC-8, Reihane Boghrati wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm writing a client for Neo4j to evaluate that with BG benchmark. > As far as I know, Neo4j is using Lucene for indexing nodes and the Cypher > query for creating index is something like : CREATE INDEX ON :Users(userid) > I believe that Lucene retrieval is not 100% accurate, meaning that if it > doesn't return data, one cannot be sure data is not existed. Is that right? > I browsed different websites but I couldn't find an alternative index > service. I was wondering if anyone is aware of any other accurate index > provider that can be used in Neo4j? > > Best, > Reihane > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
