Illya, from what I gather from the rest of the team, this is a well-known scenario, fixed in 2.0, possibly backported to 1.9.6 if you can give 1.9.6 a try.
Thanks /peter G: neubauer.peter S: peter.neubauer P: +46 704 106975 L: http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer T: @peterneubauer Neo4j 2.0.0 - (graphs)-[:FOR]->(everyone) Kids LAN creative party in Malmö - Kidscraft ICE On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Peter Neubauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Illya, > and chance to get me a pointer to a reproducable scenario, so I can check? > > /peter > > G: neubauer.peter > S: peter.neubauer > P: +46 704 106975 > L: http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > T: @peterneubauer > > Neo4j 2.0.0 - (graphs)-[:FOR]->(everyone) > Kids LAN creative party in Malmö - Kidscraft ICE > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Illya <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm using Neo4j in production of a serious HEP experiment, would be nice to >> get any feedback from the Neo4j team on that.. I'm worried whether this is a >> sign of my db content being corrupted, or not. Anybody? (yeah-yeah, I should >> consider buying a license for that your answer may be, but...) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
