Understood ! :) Thanks a lot for this clear answer.
Besides, nice signature :) (the nodes) Michael On Friday, March 14, 2014 1:48:20 AM UTC+1, Michael Hunger wrote: > > In everything up to 2.0 it is affected, so you would probably add an > intermediate "Events" node that holds all the individual events there. > Or you would actually create a linked chain of events of which only the > head is connected to the user which you would then reconnect to the new > head. > > In 2.1 the handling of nodes with many rels of different types is not > longer affecting other relationship-groups. > > > Cheers, > > Michael > > ---- > (michael > <http://twitter.com/mesirii>)-[:SUPPORTS]->(*YOU*)-[:USE]->(Neo4j<http://neo4j.org> > ) > Learn Online <http://neo4j.org/learn/online_course>, > Offline<http://www.neo4j.org/events> or > Read a Book <http://graphdatabases.com> (in Deutsch<http://bit.ly/das-buch> > ) > We're trading T-shirts for cool Graph Models <http://bit.ly/graphgist> > > > > > > > > Am 13.03.2014 um 14:38 schrieb Michael Azerhad > <[email protected]<javascript:> > >: > > More specifically, could it impact some traversal from the nodes > independent of the node events? > For instance: > > (event) -> (user) -> > ..................................................... > > ^ > | > (event) > > Does the red traversal part could be impacted by a huge amount of events > on the user node? or is it totally independent? > > Thanks a lot, > > I hope I'm more clear with this example. > > On Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:29:18 PM UTC+1, Michael Azerhad wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> My question is simple: >> >> I have a User node. >> >> Each time an action is made in my application concerning the User, (for >> instance an Authentication event (loginTimestamp, etc..)), I create the >> corresponding Event node and attached it to the User node. >> It's a kind of event store, with each event attached to its concerned >> "domain model" node. >> >> So, if the user authenticates 100000 times, it will be 100000 Events >> attached to the User node. >> >> Let's assume an AuthenticatedEvent(id, occuredOn: Timestamp (indexed)) >> >> Would it lead to some performance issue for this kind of query: >> MATCH (e: AuthenticatedEvent) RETURN e ORDER BY e.occurredOn >> >> Thanks a lot, >> >> Michael >> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
