Thank you Micheal :) I figured out that I was using Neo4j embedded database, so when I changed to client-server (using java-rest binding) my problem was solved.
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:34:22 AM UTC-8, Michael Hunger wrote: > > The default number of threads for the server is 10x # of CPUs > > Perhaps you should detail more how you use that server. > > Cheers, > > Michael > > ---- > (michael > <http://twitter.com/mesirii>)-[:SUPPORTS]->(*YOU*)-[:USE]->(Neo4j<http://neo4j.org> > ) > Learn Online <http://neo4j.org/learn/online_course>, > Offline<http://www.neo4j.org/events> or > Read a Book <http://graphdatabases.com> (in Deutsch<http://bit.ly/das-buch> > ) > We're trading T-shirts for cool Graph Models <http://bit.ly/graphgist> > > > > > > > > Am 11.03.2014 um 00:25 schrieb Reihane Boghrati > <[email protected]<javascript:> > >: > > > Hi, > > I'm running a workload and I'm observing a low CPU and network utilization > on the PC hosting my Neo4j server. > The disk queue is less than 1 element long; 0.04 is a typical value. > I have increased the impose load several hundred folds and see no > improvement. Is the default number of server threads 1? > Any explanation for the low server utilization? > > Thanks, > Reihane > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
