hi thx, that one works (just tested it) : match p=(n:label1)-[:REL1*]->(m:label2) where NOT (n)-[:REL2*]->(m) return p
any other syntax ideas ? ps .. i was thing far more complex with dual match ... with to pass data to the secondary match ... and some functions to compare the 2 sets ... reg koen 2014-03-23 14:53 GMT+01:00 Tom Zeppenfeldt <[email protected]>: > as an idea , not tested.. >> > > match p=(n)-[:REL1*]->(m) > where NOT n-[:REL2*]->m > return n,m > > or return p > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Groeten / Best Regards, Koen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
