Right, NOT is for predicates not pattern matches, so the first variant doesn't work.
The second does though if you add a where clause > MATCH (p:Presentation) WHERE > NOT (p)-[:PRESENTS]->() > RETURN p Am 11.04.2014 um 22:53 schrieb Kevin Burton <[email protected]>: > > > I have tried MATCH NOT (p:Presentation)-[:PRESENTS]->() RETURN p and MATCH > (p:Presentation) NOT (p)-[:PRESENTS]->() RETURN p both give a syntax error. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
