Yes, you're right re: title. =) On Friday, April 18, 2014 12:16:16 PM UTC-4, Tom Zeppenfeldt wrote: > > I guess having both unnecessarily complicates the model. I'd get rid of > the direct one, since apparently you need the intermediate node. You can > always recreate it on the basis of the rels through the intermediate node. > And eh... may I kindly suggest to rethink the title of your next post ;) > ? > > Tom > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
