We didn't bother taking locks on the database since we knew that the user load wasn't going to be much. Last I've heard, the website was a failure with just approximately eighty thousand users. But the reasons for failure was the business model and not the technology.
It was more or less a first pass after which the client decided to take the project in house and further develop it (which never really happened) As far as efficiency goes, it had an acceptable response time with the arbitrary depth query (how deep should the query search for). We used to show 10 comments at a time fetched from the linked list. In terms of pure numbers, I dont know how performant it was. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
