Hi Stefan, Thank you for your e-mail. So there is not a way of each cluster member storing only part of the graph, I mean, to have more control over each part is stored on each cluster node?
I ask this just to see how exactly Neo4j fits into my requirements right now. Thank you again, Bernardo On Monday, June 2, 2014 3:11:42 AM UTC-4, Stefan Armbruster wrote: > > Hi, > > Neo4j's clustering model is a master-slave replication. Each cluster > member has a copy of the full graph enabling doing read operations > without cluster intercommunication - and therefore scales reads almost > linearly. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > 2014-06-02 2:35 GMT+02:00 Bernardo Hermont <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > > Hi all, > > > > I have the following questions about Neo4j > > > > Is it possible to inform which slave node I want to store data that it > is > > inserted using PUT REST interface? > > Or the data is automatically sharded along the slave servers that are > part > > of the cluster? > > > > Is there any way to do this in a clustered configuration? > > > > Regards, > > > > Bernardo > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Neo4j" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
