Hi, can this question probably clarified by some neo4j team members? I was also looking for an in-memory version of neo4j to do some graph matching of sub graphs in-memory. At a first glance, I had in mind that the ImpermanentGraphDatabase is in-memory and that this is the appropriated solutation for me (i.e. so that I don't need to re-implement everything for another in-memory graph solution). However, right now (when I had the chance to have a deeper look at ImpermanentGraphDatabase implementation) I have the impression that also the ImpermanentGraphDatabase implementation store its data finally (when cache is full) at the disk, or?
Thanks a lot in advance. Cheers, Bo On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:06:14 AM UTC+1, Tu Nguyen wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to run Neo4J in memory only without any persistent > database/file storage? > > I found the answer in the following thread, but it's 3 years ago: > http://lists.neo4j.org/pipermail/user/2010-February/002719.html > > If Neo4J does not support, please can you suggest any frameworks that > support object graph management but do not require data storage on disk. > > Thank you in advance. > > Tu > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
