Right. It definitely does not mean data corruption; just less (or more) waiting.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Chris Vest <chris.v...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > It means the enterprise lock manager copes better with higher contention. > In other words, it performs better than the community lock manager. > > -- > Chris Vest > System Engineer, Neo Technology > [ skype: mr.chrisvest, twitter: chvest ] > > > On 17 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Alan Robertson <al...@unix.sh> wrote: > > the *Enterprise Lock Manager* *keeps locks from stepping on each other* on > machines with > 5 cores. > > > "*Stepping on each other*" generally means data corruption. My test > machine has 8 cores. So, I should expect database corruption? > > > -- *Philip Rathle* VP of Products | Neo Technology +1.650.918.9595 | @prathle -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
