But that's not related to relationship-indexes. Perhaps you can explain your actual use-case (graph model), data size and queries.
I many cases you can either convert your distinctive property into a rel-type if you want to have really fast selection or just warm-up your caches for faster retrievals. Michael Am 28.08.2014 um 16:20 schrieb Chris Wj <[email protected]>: > We do lookups mostly via node properties, but we always select edges based on > edge properties. We are also planning on using the traversal framework to do > custom implementations that perform graph search and determine paths to > traverse via edge properties. It is important for us that edge property > lookup is fast in this respect. > > On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:33:28 PM UTC-4, Michael Hunger wrote: > Usually in a graph you start at entities = nodes to traverse and then use > relationship-types and properties to control the traversal. > > If your relationships are soo important that you want to look them up, they > are probably entities/nodes in disguise? > > Perhaps you can explain / describe your domain in more detail? > > Cheers, > > Michael > > Am 26.08.2014 um 16:18 schrieb Chris Wj <[email protected]>: > >> Can you explain more about why this is not a planned feature? I can think of >> many examples where quick edge property lookup is important as well as >> searching for edges. >> >> -Chris >> >> On Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:46:22 PM UTC-4, Michael Hunger wrote: >> No, not yet and the foreseeable future. There will be other means that take >> care of that. E.g. statistics on the graph. >> >> Am 13.03.2014 um 11:19 schrieb Michele Piunti <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hello, >>> It is said that Schema Indexes are to be created in labelled nodes >>> (http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/milestone/rest-api-schema-indexes.html). >>> The question is quite simple: >>> >>> Is it feasible to create a schema index on RELATIONSHIPs' properties, ie. >>> to be used to optimize Cypher Queries or traversing facilities? >>> >>> Thank you in advance, >>> Michele Piunti >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Neo4j" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
