Yes, the labels are not in that to-string-method.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right. Now that I think of it, when you retrieve nodes, the id of the node
> is also returned.
> Although it looks different, like: NODE[20]. No name or label. Always
> NODE[]
>
> The rest looks good.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
> On Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:29:23 PM UTC-5, Wes Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Those numbers are just the internal ids of the relationships. There
>> aren't any properties, so the {} is empty. It's just the display format in
>> the shell. Was that the only thing that looked wrong?
>>
>> Wes
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> | :AGG_EMAILS[193]{} |
>>> | :AGG_EMAILS[194]{} |
>>> | :AGG_EMAILS[195]{} |
>>> | :AGG_EMAILS[196]{} |
>>> | :AGG_EMAILS[197]{} |
>>> | :AGG_EMAILS[198]{} |
>>> +--------------------+
>>> 99 rows
>>> 649 ms
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
