Thanks Anders, I'll create a patch for it. Cheers, Davide
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Anders Nawroth <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you are right, we should exclude the transitive dependencies and > add back the correct versions. > > This looks like the correct place to do it: > > https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/blob/master/community/cypher/cypher/pom.xml#L96 > > /anders > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Davide D'Alto <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Have you tried excluding the conflicting transitive dependencies and >> adding them back with the correct version? >> >> That's what I've done so far. >> >> I have two problems with this solution: >> 1) I have to do some additional work (this affect only my use case so it >> might be not that important) >> 2) I don't know if the dependency has been tested with the particular >> version of the library I'm going to use >> >> Using a BOM or applying this change in the pom of org.neo4j:neo4 would >> solve the problem, I guess. >> >> By the way, I would be happy to create a patch for this. >> >> Davide >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Anders Nawroth <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Have you tried excluding the conflicting transitive dependencies and >>> adding them back with the correct version? >>> >>> /anders >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:11:18 PM UTC+2, Davide D'Alto wrote: >>> >>>> > However, we do see in several places in your output that you have >>>> mention of Neo4j 2.0.3 and Neo4j 2.1.5. Isn't this as simple as you having >>>> upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.1.5, and the older version is still in the local >>>> maven repository, and maven is correctly omitting it as a duplicate? >>>> Perhaps if you deleted .m2/repository and re-ran maven, the conflicts would >>>> be cleared up? >>>> >>>> Nope, this is the dependencies tree of org.neo4j:neo4j:jar:2.1.5: >>>> >>>> [INFO] +*- org.neo4j:neo4j:jar:2.1.5:compile* >>>> [INFO] | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-primitive-collections:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | \- org.apache.geronimo.specs: >>>> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec:jar:1.1.1:compile >>>> [INFO] | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-lucene-index:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:3.6.2:compile >>>> [INFO] | +- *org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-algo:jar:2.1.5:compile* >>>> [INFO] | | \- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-udc:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | \- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-matching:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | \- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | *+- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher:jar:2.1.5:compile* >>>> [INFO] | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-lucene-index:jar:2.1.5:compile - >>>> omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-matching:jar:2.1.5:compile - >>>> omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-algo:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | *+*- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-commons:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile - omitted >>>> for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap: >>>> concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru:jar:1.3.1:compile - omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | | \- (org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.4:compile - >>>> omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | * +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-1.9:jar:2.0.3:compile* >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.0.3:compile - omitted >>>> for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-lucene-index:jar:2.0.3:compile - >>>> omitted for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-matching:jar:2.0.3:compile - >>>> omitted for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>> [INFO] | | | +- *(org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-algo:jar:2.0.3:compile - >>>> omitted for conflict with 2.1.5)* >>>> [INFO] | | | \- (org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.3:compile - >>>> omitted for conflict with 2.10.4) >>>> [INFO] | | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.0:jar:2.0.3:compile >>>> [INFO] | | | +- org.parboiled:parboiled-scala_2.10:jar:1.1.6:compile >>>> [INFO] | | | | \- (org.parboiled:parboiled-core:jar:1.1.6:compile >>>> - omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | | +- net.sf.opencsv:opencsv:jar:2.0:compile >>>> [INFO] | | | \- (org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.3:compile - >>>> omitted for conflict with 2.10.4) >>>> [INFO] | | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.1:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.parboiled:parboiled-scala_2.10:jar:1.1.6:compile >>>> - omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | | +- (net.sf.opencsv:opencsv:jar:2.3:compile - omitted >>>> for conflict with 2.0) >>>> [INFO] | | | \- (org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.4:compile - >>>> omitted for duplicate) >>>> [INFO] | | +- com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap: >>>> concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru:jar:1.3.1:compile >>>> [INFO] | | \- org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.4:compile >>>> [INFO] | \- org.neo4j:neo4j-jmx:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>> >>>> If I'm not wrong neo4j-graph-algo, for example, get included with two >>>> different versions 2.0.3 and 2.1.5 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Davide D'Alto <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Craig, >>>>> the problem for me is that they have a transitive dependency with a >>>>> different version of some libraries, like scala-library for example: >>>>> >>>>> org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-1.9:jar:2.0.3 requires >>>>> org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.3:compile >>>>> >>>>> while >>>>> >>>>> org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher:jar:2.1.5:compile requires >>>>> org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.4:compile >>>>> >>>>> Basically, I'm wondering if there is a particular reason for them to >>>>> require different versions of the same library since it seems that using >>>>> the most up to date is ok for both >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Craig Taverner <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> My understanding is that these are not two versions of the same >>>>>> library but the same version of two different libraries: >>>>>> >>>>>> - org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-*1.9*:jar:*2.0.3* >>>>>> - org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-*2.0*:jar:*2.0.3* >>>>>> >>>>>> The version of both is *2.0.3*, the same. The libraries however have >>>>>> different *names* (one is named 1.9 and one is named 2.0). Hence two >>>>>> different libraries. Both part of Neo4j 2.0.3. This means, as Anders >>>>>> said, >>>>>> that Neo4j 2.0.3 contains two levels of support for cypher. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, we do see in several places in your output that you have >>>>>> mention of Neo4j 2.0.3 and Neo4j 2.1.5. Isn't this as simple as you >>>>>> having >>>>>> upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.1.5, and the older version is still in the local >>>>>> maven repository, and maven is correctly omitting it as a duplicate? >>>>>> Perhaps if you deleted .m2/repository and re-ran maven, the conflicts >>>>>> would >>>>>> be cleared up? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, Craig >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Davide D'Alto <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Right, >>>>>>> I didn't explain my problem properly, sorry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In our project we are using the maven enforcer plugin ( >>>>>>> http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/maven-enforcer-plugin/) to check >>>>>>> when two dependencies refer to different version of the same library. >>>>>>> With Neo4j this rule fails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maven will try to solve this conflict quietly, but you can see them >>>>>>> running >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mvn dependency:tree -Dverbose=true >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These are the conflicts caused by >>>>>>> "org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-1.9:jar:2.0.3" >>>>>>> and "org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.0:jar:2.0.3": >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.0.3:compile - >>>>>>> omitted for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-lucene-index:jar:2.0.3:compile >>>>>>> - omitted for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-matching:jar:2.0.3:compile >>>>>>> - omitted for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | +- (org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-algo:jar:2.0.3:compile - >>>>>>> omitted for conflict with 2.1.5) >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | \- (org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.3:compile >>>>>>> - omitted for conflict with 2.10.4) >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | \- (org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.3:compile >>>>>>> - omitted for conflict with 2.10.4) >>>>>>> [INFO] | | | +- (net.sf.opencsv:opencsv:jar:2.3:compile - >>>>>>> omitted for conflict with 2.0) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there any particular reason to use different versions of the same >>>>>>> library? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Anders Nawroth < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How did you add org.neo4j:neo4j to the project? >>>>>>>> Any duplicates or conflicts should be resolved automatically, at >>>>>>>> least when using Maven. >>>>>>>> The neo4j-cypher-compiler-* modules are special -- they add support >>>>>>>> for the syntax from previous versions and are not duplicates. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is the final dependency tree I get, and there's no duplicates >>>>>>>> left in it: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> org.neo4j:neo4j:jar:2.1.5 >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-kernel:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-primitive-collections:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> | \- org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jta_1.1_spec:jar:1.1. >>>>>>>> 1:compile >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-lucene-index:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> | \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:3.6.2:compile >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-algo:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-udc:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-graph-matching:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-commons:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-1.9:jar:2.0.3:compile >>>>>>>> | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.0:jar:2.0.3:compile >>>>>>>> | | +- org.parboiled:parboiled-scala_2.10:jar:1.1.6:compile >>>>>>>> | | | \- org.parboiled:parboiled-core:jar:1.1.6:compile >>>>>>>> | | \- net.sf.opencsv:opencsv:jar:2.0:compile >>>>>>>> | +- org.neo4j:neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.1:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> | +- com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap: >>>>>>>> concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru:jar:1.3.1:compile >>>>>>>> | \- org.scala-lang:scala-library:jar:2.10.4:compile >>>>>>>> +- org.neo4j:neo4j-jmx:jar:2.1.5:compile >>>>>>>> \- com.sun.tools:tools:jar:1.7:system >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know if the additional cypher-compiler libs could be made >>>>>>>> optional, I've never looked into how they are loaded. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /anders >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Davide D'Alto <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> when I include the artifact org.neo4j:neo4j in the project, >>>>>>>>> several other dependencies get added twice with different versions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This seems caused by the following dependencies: >>>>>>>>> neo4j-cypher-compiler-1.9 and neo4j-cypher-compiler-2.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For example I have: >>>>>>>>> org.neo4j:neo4j-lucene-index:2.0.3 and 2.1.5 >>>>>>>>> net.sf.opencsv:opencsv:2.3 and 2.0 >>>>>>>>> org.scala-lang:scala-library 2.10.4 and 2.10.3 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and so on ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wouldn't be possible to uniform the dependencies and select just >>>>>>>>> one version or at least make the cypher compiler libraries optional? >>>>>>>>> On exception at start up is thrown if I remove them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Davide >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>>>> the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>>>>>>> topic/neo4j/fDLiKEnKnAM/unsubscribe. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in >>>>>> the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>>>>> topic/neo4j/fDLiKEnKnAM/unsubscribe. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/fDLiKEnKnAM/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/fDLiKEnKnAM/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/fDLiKEnKnAM/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
