Ah! I didn't realize includeStats was an option. That would come in handy. Thank you.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Michael Hunger <[email protected]> wrote: > Then you could also compare the results of the tx-endpoints in terms of > nodes-created, properties-set, labels created etc. > if you provide the parameter as part of the statement { ..... > "includeStats":true ... } > You get the statistics back. > HTH Michael > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Byron Ruth <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Michael. The RETURN 1 approach has been working correctly for me >> and prevents needing to do a COUNT(*). >> >> >>> Afaik there are no plans for providing expected results (esp, as those >>> can grow gigantic). >>> >> >> Yes of course :) As mentioned, I am *only* using this approach for write >> operations where no results are being returned. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/gwnFQCjkI7U/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
