The query: MATCH (n)-[:foo*]->()
will not match if n does not have at least one foo relationship. However, explicitly setting the lower bound to 0 works: MATCH (n)-[:foo*0..1000]->() Was this an intentional design? Using an asterisk to impose "at least one" is a bit non-conventional at least in the regular expression space. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
