> On 27 Mar 2015, at 19:39, Dr Josef Karthauser 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I’m importing a load of polygons into a neo4j spatial index (neo4j 2.1.6 / 
> spatial 0.13-neo4j).
> 
> Each node is being added in it’s own individual transaction.
> 
> The system appears to be leaking files whilst doing this:
> 
> [cut]

> Why would they be being leaked? Is this a known problem that been fixed in a 
> later spatial?

Trying a simple test with just 13 spatially indexes nodes (polygons) I end up 
with the following files still open at the end of the process:

test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.fdt
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.fdx
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.frq
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.nrm
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.prx
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.tis
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3ji.tis
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jj.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jk.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jl.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jm.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jn.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jo.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jp.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jq.cfs
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jr.fdt
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/_3jr.fdx
test.db/index/lucene/node/topography__neo4j-spatial__LayerNodeIndex__internal__spatialNodeLookup__/write.lock
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6da.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6db.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dc.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dd.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6de.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6df.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dg.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6di.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dj.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dk.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dl.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dm.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dn.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dp.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dq.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dr.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6ds.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dt.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6du.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dw.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dx.cfs
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dy.cfs           
test.db/schema/index/lucene/39/_6dz.cfs           
test.db/schema/label/lucene/_6dq.cfs
test.db/schema/label/lucene/_6dr.cfs
test.db/schema/label/lucene/_6ds.cfs

That doesn’t look right.

Joe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to