i can not use the array because this way i will have all types mixed in one
array , however i have many other fields and they are related to a type for
examaple i have similarity 0.8(example) for type1 and same for the other
types, if i represent the similarity field using an array ;{0.8,0.7,0.6} i
can not differenciate which number is for type 1 and which one for
type2.... therefore i thought that use a key value synatx within the same
link will help solving this issue! any other suggestions
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 4:15:11 PM UTC+3, sandra haddad wrote:
>
> hello ,
>
> I would like to model the following, s1 and s2 are related by a link and
> this link have 2 types:type1 and type2 and 2 fields :field1,field2
> I tried to run this query
>
> CREATE (s1)-[:LINKED_TO{Type:'type1',Field:'Field1'}]->(s2)
> CREATE (s1)-[:LINKED_TO{Type:'type2',Field:'Field2'}]->(s2)
>
> but the second one override the first one and i need to maintain this
> structure for the 2 types and the 2 fields . to explain more i want to have
> something like that
> CREATE
> (s1)-[:LINKED_TO{Type:'type1',Field:'Field1'},{Type:'type2',Field:'Field2'}]->(s2)
> and i may have several types and everal fields such as
> CREATE
> (s1)-[:LINKED_TO{Type:'type1',Field:'Field1'},{Type:'type2',Field:'Field2'},......{Type:'typen',Field:'Fieldn}]->(s2)
>
> so i decided to use a collection with a key, value but i don't know how to
> use it and can't find any useful reference. Help !
>
> Regards
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
