Multi-tenancy is a feature that we would also be very interested in seeing in future releases. Thanks!
--- Clark D. Richey, Jr CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER 240.252.7507 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> WWW.FACTGEM.COM <http://www.factgem.com/> > On Jul 1, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Sebastien Just <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. > It's more a production feature (multi-tenancy) to keep customer databases > physically separated while simply accessible, more than just a development > issue. Having one server and/or one instance per customer on many ports may > lead us to a really expensive solution not suitable for our business model. > > If we would use some software tricks (labels, index) to separate data, we > wouldn't be able to grab some customer/enterprise database to move it, > duplicate or simply move it on their own appliances. > > Hope we will see multi-tenancy one day in the so great neo4j ! > > Best regards. > > Sébastien Just > Ingénierie Web Créative - www.seij.net > <http://www.seij.net/?utm_source=seij&utm_medium=email&utm_content=textlink&utm_campaign=signature> > - @seij_fr > Suivez-moi : <http://www.twitter.com/seij_fr> > <https://www.facebook.com/seij.net> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastienjust> > <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/company/seij-ideasign> > Tél. +33 684 04 89 34 — Fixe. +33 97 040 64 46 > > <http://www.seij.net/> > 2015-06-08 6:52 GMT+02:00 Jacob Hansson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Hey Sebastien! > > We did merge preliminary work for that in, but decided to roll it back out, > it wasn't the right approach. This is still in the pipeline and we'll get > there - but it's not actively in dev right now. > > Until we roll in support for it, letting us know you need it keeps it high in > the product backlog. The suggested workaround for now is to either run > multiple neo server instances on different ports, or (if you're in dev) to > run a single server and multiplex which store directory it's serving by > changing the config setting and restarting it. > > /jake > > On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 1:32:20 PM UTC-5, Sebastien Just wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that jakewins <https://github.com/jakewins> added a multi-hosting > feature that had been merged on master (issue #1908). > Is it possible to activate this feature for testing in standalone server (if > so, what are the configuration parameters needed) , or do I need to create a > programatically (embedded) dedicated launcher for that ? > > Thank you > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/eOLzO7w5taQ/unsubscribe > <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neo4j/eOLzO7w5taQ/unsubscribe>. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
