Could this be related to this bug:

https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/issues/4910

On Tuesday, 7 July 2015 16:59:32 UTC+1, Clark Richey wrote:
>
> I have confirmed the same behavior on 2.2.3 as well.
>
> Clark Richey
> [email protected] <javascript:>
>
>
>  
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Clark Richey <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Sorry. I’m running 2.2.2 enterprise.
>
> I do have a test which I have attached. In creating this test I can see 
> that events actually don’t seem to be firing consistently at all. If I 
> delete the DB on disk between runs I can get it to fire but if I run it a 
> second time without deleting the DB on disk it never fires.
>
> When the events do fire you will see that iterating through either the 
> assignedNodeProperties or the createdRelationships yields no data.
>
>
>
> <TransactionHandlerExample.groovy>
>
> Clark Richey
> [email protected] <javascript:>
>
>
>  
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Michael Hunger <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Hey Clark,
>
> do you have a small test that reproduces the issue? And which version are 
> you testing it with?
>
> thanks a lot
>
> Michael
>
> Am 06.07.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Clark Richey <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>>:
>
> Hello,
> I’m implementing a TransactionEventHandler in much the same way that is 
> presented here: http://maxdemarzi.com/2015/03/25/triggers-in-neo4j/.
>
>
> When I have transactions that create relationships, I can correctly view 
> those relationships by calling transactionData.createdRelationships().
>
> However, if inside of a relationship I simply set a node property by 
> invoking node.setProperty(key,value) then the TransactionData object that 
> is passed to the afterCommit method of my TransactionEventHandler does not 
> list any data when the transactionData.assignedNodeProperties() method is 
> invoked. The transaction did commit successfully because I can retrieve the 
> node in a separate transaction and see the update value.
>
> Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding the expected behavior? Thanks!
>
> ---
>
>
> <fg-logo.png>
>
>
> Clark D. Richey, Jr
> CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
> 240.252.7507
> [email protected] <javascript:>
> WWW.FACTGEM.COM <http://www.factgem.com/>
>  
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Neo4j" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to