I understand similar question has been asked before, however I still want 
to get expert opinion about my situation.

We are creating a graph service/library (lets call this Topology library) 
which different services will use to store graphs and apply some graph 
algorithms on those graphs. This library will internally use one the neo4j 
client library (e.g. py2neo) to talk to neo4j server over REST. Each of the 
 services using Topology library will store its own graph through this 
library will perform search and update in sub sequent calls on their 
corresponding graph. 

As neo4j does not support storing multiple graph in single instance, I am 
thinking of creating a new instance of neo4j whenever a service calls 
Topology library to create a new graph. Topology service in turn will 
create a new instance of neo4j in this case and create that graph on that 
instance. That service will provide the name of that graph and topology 
library will use that name as reference for sub sequent search/update calls 
on that graph. Initially each of these graph can be created in single 
machine but in the long run we can explore using Containers on top of 
Kubernetes to ensure that different neo4j instance containers are created 
on the machines which have enough resources. 

My questions are  - 
1. Is it a good and valid design? I have not used neo4j before, what issues 
this design can have?
2. If yes, does neo4j provide an API/REST interface to 
create/start/top/kill a new instance?

Thanks in advance !

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to