For recursive breakdown structures, is it better to model as ...
a. Group HAS Subgroup... or
b. Subgroup PART_OF Group ?? ....
Some tutorials imply model both (the parent of and child of example) while
the subtype examples imply that either will work fine (generally going with
PART-OF)
Based on experience, is there a practical reason for choosing one or the
other or use both?
Thanks,
Dave
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Neo4j" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
