Could you attach something simple as VisualVM, https://visualvm.java.net/ to the process when it runs CC and sample on memory to get an idea of what it is that takes up so much memory?
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:35 PM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j < [email protected]> wrote: > As an update - after running for 48 hours the GC again runs out of heap. I > can increase the heap size again (above 124GB) but getting a bit tedious > now. > There are no indicators that the DB has a problem - I was just interested > to ensure that its integrity was good. > > Let me know if you wish me to try anything else.... > > Wayne > > > On Sunday, 5 March 2017 08:04:36 UTC, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Looks like this fixed the problem - for the Heap size. >> Setting Env variables doesn't appear to work - will you be coding this in >> to the script ? >> >> In my case the 90% phase comprises a busy machine, with little IO >> activity. The data appears to have been loaded into the memory and the >> consistency check is running. Presumably this will run for many days ? >> >> .................... 90% >> 2017-03-04 15:14:41.886+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] === >> Stage7_RS_Backward === >> 2017-03-04 15:14:41.887+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] I/Os >> RelationshipStore >> Reads: 3358829271 >> Random Reads: 2730096948 >> ScatterIndex: 81 >> >> 2017-03-04 15:14:41.888+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >> Counts: >> 10338220915 skipCheck >> 1697668358 missCheck >> 5621138677 checked >> 10338220915 correctSkipCheck >> 1688855306 skipBackup >> 3951022794 overwrite >> 2032128 noCacheSkip >> 239346600 activeCache >> 119509522 clearCache >> 2429587415 relSourcePrevCheck >> 995786837 relSourceNextCheck >> 2058354842 <(205)%20835-4842> relTargetPrevCheck >> 137409583 relTargetNextCheck >> 6917470274 forwardLinks >> 7991190672 backLinks >> 1052730774 nullLinks >> 2017-03-04 15:14:41.888+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >> Memory[used:33.59 GB, free:90.41 GB, total:124.00 GB, max:124.00 GB] >> 2017-03-04 15:14:41.888+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Done >> in 1h 40m 354ms >> .........2017-03-04 15:37:20.050+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >> === RelationshipGroupStore-RelGrp === >> 2017-03-04 15:37:20.051+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] I/Os >> RelationshipGroupStore >> Reads: 411311642 >> Random Reads: 71933550 >> ScatterIndex: 17 >> NodeStore >> Reads: 208717760 >> Random Reads: 205603260 >> ScatterIndex: 98 >> RelationshipStore >> Reads: 419830207 >> Random Reads: 112104577 >> ScatterIndex: 26 >> >> 2017-03-04 15:37:20.051+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >> Counts: >> 2017-03-04 15:37:20.052+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >> Memory[used:6.03 GB, free:117.97 GB, total:124.00 GB, max:124.00 GB] >> 2017-03-04 15:37:20.052+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Done >> in 22m 38s 163ms >> . >> >> >> >> Wayne >> >> >> >> >> >> On Saturday, 4 March 2017 09:16:43 UTC, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> So I have added: >>> $ cat neo4j-admin >>> #!/usr/bin/env bash >>> # Copyright (c) 2016 "Neo Technology," >>> # Network Engine for Objects in Lund AB [http://neotechnology.com] >>> # >>> # This file is part of Neo4j. >>> # >>> # Neo4j is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify >>> # it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as >>> # published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the >>> # License, or (at your option) any later version. >>> # >>> # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >>> # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >>> # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >>> # GNU Affero General Public License for more details. >>> # >>> # You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public >>> License >>> # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >>> set -o errexit -o nounset -o pipefail >>> [[ "${TRACE:-}" ]] && set -o xtrace >>> >>> : "${NEO4J_BIN:=$(dirname "$0")}" >>> readonly NEO4J_BIN >>> . "${NEO4J_BIN}/neo4j-shared.sh" >>> >>> main() { >>> setup_environment >>> check_java >>> build_classpath >>> export NEO4J_HOME NEO4J_CONF >>> exec "${JAVA_CMD}" -Xmx124G -Xms124G -cp "${CLASSPATH}" >>> -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 "org.neo4j.commandline.admin.AdminTool" "$@" >>> } >>> >>> main "$@" >>> >>> I'll let you know in 24 hours..... >>> >>> Wayne >>> >>> On Saturday, 4 March 2017 00:03:26 UTC, Michael Hunger wrote: >>>> >>>> Can you try to edit the script directly and add the memory parameters >>>> there? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:49 PM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes >>>>> >>>>> Also, in the 90% scan, what every Java memory parameter I use, htop >>>>> shows the same memory foot print. Its as if the heap isn't being set as >>>>> per the env parameters that you area asking me to set. >>>>> >>>>> Wayne >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 3 March 2017 07:51:48 UTC, Mattias Persson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Querying Lucene, at the very least the way consistency checker uses >>>>>> it, has a drawback that all matching documents will be read and kept in >>>>>> heap before going through them. >>>>>> >>>>>> So let me ask you something about your data: are there certain >>>>>> property values that are very common and also indexed? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 7:07:31 PM UTC+1, >>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It appears not: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> $env >>>>>>> JAVA_MEMORY_OPTS=-Xmx32G -Xms32G >>>>>>> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .................... 90% >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:24:55.705+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> === Stage7_RS_Backward === >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:24:55.706+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> I/Os >>>>>>> RelationshipStore >>>>>>> Reads: 3373036269 >>>>>>> Random Reads: 2732592348 >>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 81 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:24:55.707+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> Counts: >>>>>>> 10338061780 skipCheck >>>>>>> 1697668359 missCheck >>>>>>> 5621138678 checked >>>>>>> 10338061780 correctSkipCheck >>>>>>> 1688855306 skipBackup >>>>>>> 3951022794 overwrite >>>>>>> 2191262 noCacheSkip >>>>>>> 239346600 activeCache >>>>>>> 119509522 clearCache >>>>>>> 2429587416 relSourcePrevCheck >>>>>>> 995786837 relSourceNextCheck >>>>>>> 2058354842 relTargetPrevCheck >>>>>>> 137409583 relTargetNextCheck >>>>>>> 6917470274 forwardLinks >>>>>>> 7991190672 backLinks >>>>>>> 1052730774 nullLinks >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:24:55.708+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> Memory[used:404.70 MB, free:1.63 GB, total:2.03 GB, max:26.67 GB] >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:24:55.708+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> Done in 1h 37m 39s 828ms >>>>>>> .........2017-03-01 23:45:36.032+0000 INFO >>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] === RelationshipGroupStore-RelGrp >>>>>>> === >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:45:36.032+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> I/Os >>>>>>> RelationshipGroupStore >>>>>>> Reads: 410800979 >>>>>>> Random Reads: 102164662 >>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 24 >>>>>>> NodeStore >>>>>>> Reads: 229862945 >>>>>>> Random Reads: 226895703 >>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 98 >>>>>>> RelationshipStore >>>>>>> Reads: 423304043 >>>>>>> Random Reads: 139746630 >>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 33 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:45:36.032+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> Counts: >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:45:36.033+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> Memory[used:661.75 MB, free:1.39 GB, total:2.03 GB, max:26.67 GB] >>>>>>> 2017-03-01 23:45:36.034+0000 INFO [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] >>>>>>> Done in 20m 40s 326ms >>>>>>> .Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-19" >>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.util.BytesRef.<init>(BytesRef.java:73) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.FSTOrdsOutputs.read( >>>>>>> FSTOrdsOutputs.java:181) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.FSTOrdsOutputs.read( >>>>>>> FSTOrdsOutputs.java:32) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.Outputs.readFinalOutput(Outputs. >>>>>>> java:77) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.readNextRealArc(FST.java:1094) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.findTargetArc(FST.java:1262) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.util.fst.FST.findTargetArc(FST.java:1186) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum. >>>>>>> seekExact(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.java:405) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermContext.build(TermContext.java:94) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery.createWeight(TermQuery. >>>>>>> java:192) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.createWeight(IndexSea >>>>>>> rcher.java:904) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.ConstantScoreQuery.createWeight(Con >>>>>>> stantScoreQuery.java:119) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.createWeight(IndexSea >>>>>>> rcher.java:904) >>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanWeight.<init>(BooleanWeight. >>>>>>> java:57) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have also tried larger memory values. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wayne. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 01:52:47 UTC, Michael Hunger wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry I just learned that neo4j-admin uses a different variable >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "You can pass memory options to the JVM via the `JAVA_MEMORY_OPTS` >>>>>>>> variable as a workaround though." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 28.02.2017 um 18:50 schrieb unrealadmin23 via Neo4j < >>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Michael, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After running the check_consistency command for 1 day with the >>>>>>>> above parameters, it failed in exactly the same manner. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $env | grep -i java >>>>>>>> JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx32G -Xms32G >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any other ideas ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wayne >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 February 2017 16:57:49 UTC, Michael Hunger wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you have really that much RAM in your machine ? 120G usually >>>>>>>>> doesn't make sense. Most people run with 32G as large heap. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That said. I asked and currently the numbers from the config are >>>>>>>>> not used, you have to do: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> export JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx24G -Xms24G >>>>>>>>> neo4j-admin ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:32 AM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I should have said, that the head sizes are the ones that I have >>>>>>>>>> set in neo4j.conf. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Will these be used by check-consistency or do I need to supply >>>>>>>>>> them elsewhere ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wayne. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 February 2017 07:27:33 UTC, >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Michael, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> neo4j-admin check-consistency --database=test.db --verbose >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> dbms.memory.heap.initial_size=120000m >>>>>>>>>>> dbms.memory.heap.max_size=120000m >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wayne. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 27 February 2017 02:47:26 UTC, Michael Hunger wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How did you call the consistency checker? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How much heap did you provide for it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Michael >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:28 PM, unrealadmin23 via Neo4j < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The following o/p was obtained: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> .................... 90% >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:03:16.883+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] === Stage7_RS_Backward === >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:03:16.885+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] I/Os >>>>>>>>>>>>> RelationshipStore >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reads: 3374851294 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Random Reads: 2743390177 >>>>>>>>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 81 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:03:16.886+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Counts: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10338005177 skipCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1697668360 missCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5621138678 checked >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10338005177 correctSkipCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1688855306 skipBackup >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3951022795 overwrite >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2247865 noCacheSkip >>>>>>>>>>>>> 239346598 activeCache >>>>>>>>>>>>> 119509521 clearCache >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2429587416 relSourcePrevCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 995786837 relSourceNextCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2058354842 relTargetPrevCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 137409583 relTargetNextCheck >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6917470274 forwardLinks >>>>>>>>>>>>> 7991190672 backLinks >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1052730774 nullLinks >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:03:16.887+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Memory[used:1.09 GB, >>>>>>>>>>>>> free:1.07 GB, total:2.17 GB, max:26.67 GB] >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:03:16.887+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Done in 1h 36m 37s 219ms >>>>>>>>>>>>> .........2017-02-26 00:23:26.188+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] === >>>>>>>>>>>>> RelationshipGroupStore-RelGrp === >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:23:26.189+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] I/Os >>>>>>>>>>>>> NodeStore >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reads: 231527337 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Random Reads: 228593774 >>>>>>>>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 98 >>>>>>>>>>>>> RelationshipStore >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reads: 420334193 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Random Reads: 143404207 >>>>>>>>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 34 >>>>>>>>>>>>> RelationshipGroupStore >>>>>>>>>>>>> Reads: 409845841 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Random Reads: 105935972 >>>>>>>>>>>>> ScatterIndex: 25 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:23:26.189+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Counts: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:23:26.190+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Memory[used:751.21 MB, >>>>>>>>>>>>> free:1.29 GB, total:2.02 GB, max:26.67 GB] >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-26 00:23:26.191+0000 INFO >>>>>>>>>>>>> [o.n.c.ConsistencyCheckService] Done in 20m 9s 303ms >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-11" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.getFrame(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:131) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.pushFrame(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum >>>>>>>>>>>>> .java:158) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.seekExact(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum >>>>>>>>>>>>> .java:391) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermContext.build(TermContext.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 94) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery.createWeight(TermQuery. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:192) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Const >>>>>>>>>>>>> antScoreQuery.createWeight(ConstantScoreQuery.java:119) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anWeight.<init>(BooleanWeight.java:57) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anQuery.createWeight(BooleanQuery.java:239) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createNormalizedWeight(IndexSearcher.java:887) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:535) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.kernel.api.impl.sche >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma.reader.SimpleIndexReader.countIndexedNodes(SimpleIndexRea >>>>>>>>>>>>> der.java:136) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.verifyNodeCorrectlyIndexed >>>>>>>>>>>>> (PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:171) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.checkIndexToLabels(Propert >>>>>>>>>>>>> yAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:113) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:71) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:48) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.dispatch(ConsistencyReporter.java:124) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.forNode(ConsistencyReporter.java:440) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:63) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:39) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.RecordCheckWorker.run(RecordCheckWorker.java:77) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.unsafe.impl.batchimport.cache.idmapping.string. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Workers$Worker.run(Workers.java:137) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-21" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnumFrame.<init>(OrdsSegmentTermsEn >>>>>>>>>>>>> umFrame.java:52) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.<init>(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:84) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsFieldReader.iterator(OrdsFieldReader.java:141) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermContext.build(TermContext.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 93) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery.createWeight(TermQuery. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:192) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anWeight.<init>(BooleanWeight.java:57) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anQuery.createWeight(BooleanQuery.java:239) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createNormalizedWeight(IndexSearcher.java:887) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:535) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.kernel.api.impl.sche >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma.reader.SimpleIndexReader.countIndexedNodes(SimpleIndexRea >>>>>>>>>>>>> der.java:136) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.verifyNodeCorrectlyIndexed >>>>>>>>>>>>> (PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:171) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.checkIndexToLabels(Propert >>>>>>>>>>>>> yAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:113) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:71) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:48) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.dispatch(ConsistencyReporter.java:124) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.forNode(ConsistencyReporter.java:440) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:63) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:39) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.RecordCheckWorker.run(RecordCheckWorker.java:77) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.unsafe.impl.batchimport.cache.idmapping.string. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Workers$Worker.run(Workers.java:137) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-8" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.getFrame(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:128) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.pushFrame(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum >>>>>>>>>>>>> .java:158) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.seekExact(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum >>>>>>>>>>>>> .java:391) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermContext.build(TermContext.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 94) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery.createWeight(TermQuery. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:192) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Const >>>>>>>>>>>>> antScoreQuery.createWeight(ConstantScoreQuery.java:119) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anWeight.<init>(BooleanWeight.java:57) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anQuery.createWeight(BooleanQuery.java:239) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createNormalizedWeight(IndexSearcher.java:887) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:535) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.kernel.api.impl.sche >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma.reader.SimpleIndexReader.countIndexedNodes(SimpleIndexRea >>>>>>>>>>>>> der.java:136) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.verifyNodeCorrectlyIndexed >>>>>>>>>>>>> (PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:171) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.checkIndexToLabels(Propert >>>>>>>>>>>>> yAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:113) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:71) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:48) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.dispatch(ConsistencyReporter.java:124) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.forNode(ConsistencyReporter.java:440) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:63) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:39) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.RecordCheckWorker.run(RecordCheckWorker.java:77) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.unsafe.impl.batchimport.cache.idmapping.string. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Workers$Worker.run(Workers.java:137) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-46" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.FSTOrdsOutputs.newOutput(FSTOrdsOutputs.java:225) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.blocktreeords.FSTOrdsOutputs.add( >>>>>>>>>>>>> FSTOrdsOutputs.java:162) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.block >>>>>>>>>>>>> treeords.OrdsSegmentTermsEnum.seekExact(OrdsSegmentTermsEnum >>>>>>>>>>>>> .java:450) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.index.TermContext.build(TermContext.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 94) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery.createWeight(TermQuery. >>>>>>>>>>>>> java:192) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Const >>>>>>>>>>>>> antScoreQuery.createWeight(ConstantScoreQuery.java:119) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anWeight.<init>(BooleanWeight.java:57) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Boole >>>>>>>>>>>>> anQuery.createWeight(BooleanQuery.java:239) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createWeight(IndexSearcher.java:904) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.createNormalizedWeight(IndexSearcher.java:887) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.lucene.search.Index >>>>>>>>>>>>> Searcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:535) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.kernel.api.impl.sche >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma.reader.SimpleIndexReader.countIndexedNodes(SimpleIndexRea >>>>>>>>>>>>> der.java:136) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.verifyNodeCorrectlyIndexed >>>>>>>>>>>>> (PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:171) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.checkIndexToLabels(Propert >>>>>>>>>>>>> yAndNodeIndexedCheck.java:113) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:71) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNodeIndexedCheck.check(PropertyAndNodeIndex >>>>>>>>>>>>> edCheck.java:48) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.dispatch(ConsistencyReporter.java:124) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.report.C >>>>>>>>>>>>> onsistencyReporter.forNode(ConsistencyReporter.java:440) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:63) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.PropertyAndNode2LabelIndexProcessor.process(PropertyAn >>>>>>>>>>>>> dNode2LabelIndexProcessor.java:39) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.consistency.checking >>>>>>>>>>>>> .full.RecordCheckWorker.run(RecordCheckWorker.java:77) >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.neo4j.unsafe.impl.batchimport.cache.idmapping.string. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Workers$Worker.run(Workers.java:137) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-22" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-10" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-40" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-58" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-61" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-18" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-25" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-45" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-28" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-50" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-39" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception in thread "ParallelRecordScanner-Stage8_PS_Props-51" >>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Neo4j" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Neo4j" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/neo4j/-BMXSwymS90/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Mattias Persson Neo4j Hacker at Neo Technology -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
