Hi, At the Debian BTS there is a bit similar bug reported[1]. Also, Lennart Poettering proposed a 64 bits fixup[2] for this problem. Which one is to apply? Maybe it is fixed with Joe's final patch[3]? Lennart says that [2] causes an ABI breakage and yes, I also think it does. If I do [1] or [2], then does it mean that applications using libneon25 needs to be recompiled with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 ?
Thanks for any pointers, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350619 [2] http://0pointer.de/public/neon-off_t-64.patch [3] http://mailman.webdav.org/pipermail/neon/2006-March/002196.html _______________________________________________ neon mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/neon
