Hello, because of neon's frequent API breaking, someone at bugzilla.gentoo.org suggested neon was meant to be copied into the application instead of installed as library to be linked. For reference:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139318 Now, I would like to use neon in a new application, and would like to have confirmation on the above point. You can understand I don't want to change my code as frequent as it looks I would have to do judging from the bug report(s), if I'd use it linked. OTOH, I'd have no problem with including neon in my source, since I'm using the GPL2, as well. So, which of the following do you think applies: - neon will continue to break its API frequently, so inclusion is sensible, at least for some time - the API is fixed now, and will only change in exceptional circmstances Thanks for your opinion, Regards, ralf _______________________________________________ neon mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/neon
