On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 12:53 +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > Can you try this patch? If it still fails please give the new debug > output.
Simple and efficient. That is really better. Thank you. Now, have you got an idea how long I will have to wait before getting a Win32 client working with my server configuration to spread in my company ? Is there any good reason to deliver win32 svn clients built with neon 0.26 whereas neon 0.25.5 is good enough - from my point of view ? At the moment, the only one win32 clients working properly in such a SPNEGO configuration (because of the 0.26.2 crash bug) are: . svn command line 1.3.2 (or JavaHL for Subclipse) . TortoiseSVN 1.4.0 (because built with neon 0.25.5) Of course, I may compile them on Windows too but it take 10 minutes for me to compile on Linux... and it seems to be almost an impossible mission to get svn or tortoisesvn compiled on win32 ! As you can see, I'm "desperated" to deliver a proper Subversion service in my company. Maybe I'm too perfectionist... Thank you again and regards, -- Yves Martin _______________________________________________ neon mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/neon
