Didn't want to play the words game, so I said "about" 20% Some argue that 40mm is 80% of 50mm making a 20% "difference". (I believe this is correct math.) Some argue that 50mm is 25% larger than 40mm making it 75% of the size. (Advertisers say 25% "bigger/larger" than a 40mm tube) A play on words difference vs bigger/larger. Since this argument goes on a lot, I said "about" 20%. I didn't want to take a pole or offer an average of "about" 22.5% to make more happy with an average. In any case, the Z568 is worth (or simply sold for) a lot more than an IN-18 at about 22.5% bigger in size for "about" four times the cost. No doubt, a beautiful set of tubes. Congrats to the new owner and the seller. Would like to own the clock it goes in (assuming a clock of course). Michail In a message dated 11/29/2010 6:55:02 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
> Z568 is 50mm > IN-18 is 40mm > > about 20% diff. > Even by those numbers, the Z568 digit is 25% larger than the IN-18. Not 20%. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
