I have to admit, lately I too have become smitten with the B7971 tube.
It's a really nice stalwart hunk of glass that seems to run forever. I
would REALLY like to know if there are any NOS 7971's still out there.
There must be, somewhere? Yes?

On Jun 4, 9:10 am, Wayne de Geere III <[email protected]> wrote:
> I bought the first Nixisat from Jeff, a cylinder one in Dec '03. Then the bug 
> bit again in late '08 and found a wood base one on eBay, snatched it up, the 
> seller just happened to be John Miktuk who wrote the firmware. Later he 
> discovered a Nixisat base, one of his development prototypes and I bought 
> that one as well and i populated it with all red Z568M tubes in it for 
> something different.
>
> Since then the nixie fever has only gotten worse, but for the better. :) I 
> can't count anymore the number of tubes and clocks, I suppose that means I 
> have definitely arrived.
>
> I came in at the tail-end of the MOD_SIX project and purchased #49 and #50 of 
> the first production run, I can't wait to put my 7971 tubes to use, I haven't 
> been this excited about anything in a while though I'm also ordering two of 
> the Cogwheel X8 kits as well, I am intrigued with the idea of a bunch of 
> alphanumeric nixies with a Bluetooth computer interface, I am really excited 
> to see what can be done with it.
>
> Sent from my iPad 2 3G
>
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 20:13, Greg P <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Wayne,
>
> > Damn, you're lucky enough to have 3 of Jeff's NixiSat's....at least
> > you got them when the price was right.
>
> > I like the 9020AA's but don't have any, and I have a stash of B7971's
> > that I have earmarked for one of Michael Barile and Carl Ott's MOD_SIX
> > that I ordered.  Glad to hear you want to commission Michael for a
> > Z568M piece, his clocks are absolutely amazing and his workmanship is
> > impeccable....
>
> > Good luck on your quest for the unobtainum.
>
> > On Jun 2, 3:06 am, Wayne de Geere III <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'm a big fan of Jeff's clocks. Back in December 2003 I paused and 
> >> wondered if $1200 was too much to spend on a clock. At the time Jeff was 
> >> also selling spare Z568M tubes to purchasers of his clocks for $35 each. 
> >> My first from him was a cylindrical Nixisat. At that time he had already 
> >> sold 8 of the 10 cylinder Nixisats in that round acrylic enclosure, I have 
> >> cursed myself ever since for not having bought both. That was the 
> >> beginning of my nixie clock fever and now, thousands of dollars in tubes 
> >> and clocks later, I keep my eyes open for those parting with Jeff's clocks 
> >> on eBay, they don't come around that often, people just don't let them go.
>
> >> My "tube of 2011" is turning out to be the B-7971, I've been gathering 
> >> them from the four corners of the globe for Cogwheel's X8 bluetooth, the 
> >> MOD-SIX_7971 project and some other FLW devices as they come around.
>
> >> I've also recently bought a few B8971s (the smaller version of the B7971) 
> >> but I don't have anything to put them into... yet.
>
> >> On my long term "must have" list are the Rodan CD47 and F9020AA tube 
> >> clocks. I'm also hoping to commission Michael Barile to create a Z568M 
> >> clock or two as well, I'm a big fan and most of his clocks as they are 
> >> derived from Jeff Thomas GPS disciplined hardware and John Miktuk's 
> >> firmware.
>
> >> What other tubes are others particularly enchanted in?
>
> >> On 2011 Jun 01, at 18:42 , Greg P wrote:
>
> >>> Wayne I'm glad someone else agrees with my opinion of the Z568M/
> >>> Z5680M's...  You have good taste in clocks...Jeff's pieces are
> >>> amazing.
>
> >>> On Jun 1, 9:20 pm, Wayne de Geere III <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> I do agree and I currently own three Z568M/Z5680M clocks, all from Jeff 
> >>>> Thomas. They really are in so many ways the perfect large nixie, 
> >>>> proportionally as well as filament shape. I think the IN-18 tubes are a 
> >>>> smaller, more affordable version and I've given several of Jeff's 
> >>>> Nixichron clocks as gifts, everyone who has received one has been 
> >>>> delighted by them.
>
> >>>> On 2011 Jun 01, at 17:03 , Greg P wrote:
>
> >>>>> I might be in the minority here, but I still think the Z568M Z5680M's
> >>>>> are by far the most attractive and properly proportioned Nixie I've
> >>>>> ever seen.
>
> >>>>> CD47's may be big, but the shapes of the digits are too stretched out
> >>>>> and not very proportional IMHO.  Just look at the number 4 cathode,
> >>>>> with it's funky shape and off center glowing lead off bottom standoff..
>
> >>>>> Maybe I would think differently if I owned a set, but not a high
> >>>>> priority for my collection, especially at those prices.
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
> >>>>> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >>> "neonixie-l" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "neonixie-l" group.
> > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to