Jens, It's actually worse than that!
5:23:31 becomes: 1010 010 1100 110 1000 So not only is it not binary, but the bit ordering is backwards. Which makes it all the more interesting :-) Terry On Nov 6, 4:26 am, jb-electronics <[email protected]> wrote: > Nice! But it is not a true binary clock since it is based on the base of ten > and > not two. > > I.e. 5:23:31 becomes this in your BCD clock > > 101 > 010 > 0011 > 011 > 0001 > > but this in a base 2 binary clock: > > 0101 > 010111 > 011111 > > Personally, I like the socond version better because it looks more uniform, > but > nevertheless, quite a nice find! > > Best regards, > Jens > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
