It has become apparent to me that you can not judge someone else's design on your own taste. I think the features of the clock are superior and there is probably nothing wrong with the electronic design either. Just a thought, why didn't you incorporate an ambient light sensor to automatically dim the tubes or even turn them off in (almost) complete darkness?
The stainless case, IMO is not that great, the finish is nice but the shape is not doing it for me. Having said that, it does look better than the acrylic one that Nick showed us. The costs you mention sound a bit steep to me unless you included the hours it took you guys to develop it. If this is your way of making a living, that is totally fair, if it is a hobby project, I wouldn't include the developing hours into the cost price. Anyway, it's still a nice clock to look at. Michel On Feb 10, 6:25 am, Jeff Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 9, 12:10 pm, Nicholas Stock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You're not much of a fan of Hi-Fi Jeff? ;-) > > Dang, you caught me... > > We recently replaced the "Symphonic" brand AM/FM receiver, clad in the > finest Asian hardwood, with simulated woodgrain vinyl veneer. > :)) > > Seriously though, it's hard to have anything too nice that'll survive > daily use by a bunch of small kids. > > Regards, Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
