Yes, I agree! It gives a bit of insight to what "Cathode poisoning"
actually refers to.

Thanks for typing this up!
Michel


On Apr 25, 10:24 pm, Imbanon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Finally a good answer to this question. That was very informing.
> Thanks!
>
> On Apr 25, 10:26 am, "JohnK" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I have noticed many discussions about the lifetime specifications of 
> > Nixies. I haven't noticed anyone quoting the manufacturer definition of 
> > lifetime -  but I may have missed it. So, read on .......
>
> > "Electronic Counting circuits techniques devices ", Mullard Limited, 
> > October 1967. approx. 220 pages. Many circuits.
> > Various authors and sources.
> > There seem to be about eight of these books available through ABE ranging 
> > $20 to $60. Bound to be others at the usual places too.
>
> > The approx 13 page chapter on numerical indicator tubes is based on 
> > material supplied by B. Butler of the Mullard Industrial Electronics 
> > division.
>
> > I have included some of the text below rather than attach scans [if 
> > allowed],
> > John Kaesehagen
> > Australia.
>
> > From the 'numerical indicator tubes' chapter I quote this [via OCR] :-
> > "The normal figures quoted in published data for the life of a numerical
>
> > indicator tube are 5000 hours with a continuous display of one character,
>
> > and 30 000 hours when sequentially changing the display from one digit
>
> > to the next every 100 hours or less. The end of life for the above figures 
> > is
>
> > taken to be the time when any character is unable to be covered completely,
>
> > although several more thousand hours would probably have to elapse
>
> > before the character became completely indecipherable."
>
> > The above is contained within this section:-
>
> > "      LIFE PERFORMANCE
>
> > The expected life performance of a numerical indicator tube depends to
>
> > a greal extent on the length of time the discharge is investing any 
> > particular
>
> > cathode. With any gas-discharge device, the cathode is subjected to constant
>
> > ion bombardment which removes material from the cathode and
>
> > deposits it elsewhere in the tube. This "sputtering" process, as it is 
> > known,
>
> > is, in fact, put to good use in many cold cathode gasfllled tubes during
>
> > processing. The cathode surlaces are cleaned in this manner and any
>
> > sputter material thrown on the glass walls of the envelope effectively seals
>
> > in any foreign matter that may affect the performance of the tube during
>
> > its life. In a numerical indicator tube, however, although a clean cathode
>
> > is desirable, sputter material on the envelope would impair the visibility
>
> > of the display. Some sputtering is unavoidable, but since the rate of
>
> > sputter is proportional to the peak current of the tube, it can be contained
>
> > within limits.
>
> > If one cathode is continually glowing, sputter material from that
>
> > cathode is deposited on other cathode surfaces in close proximity.
>
> > Although the legibility of the glowing cathode is not affected to a great
>
> > extent, the cathodes on which the sputter is deposited are affected. In
>
> > fact, the work function of the metal of the adjacent cathodes alters in
>
> > such a way that it requires a higher current to completely cover the
>
> > cathode and if this current is not available, the cathode appears patchy.
>
> > This imposes a minimum permitted current level on the tube. It is possible
>
> > that complete erosion of the cathode may result from bombardment,
>
> > but this is unusual.
>
> > If the discharge is cycled betweerr characters fairly regularly, this gives
>
> > a very much improved life figure since each cathode, although receiving
>
> > some sputter material, is subjected to the cleansing action of bombardment.
>
> > In this case, the higher the current, the more effective the cleansing.
>
> > The viewing area of the envelope is protected from sputter material by
>
> > the use of a shield, or mesh, which is usually connected to the anode.
>
> > From the foregoing it is evident that the end of life of a numerical
>
> > indicator tube is not abrupt, but takes the form of a gradual deterioration
>
> > of a character. This is convenient, because it enables a tube which is
>
> > showing signs of deterioration to be replaced before it fails completely.
>
> > The normal figures quoted in published data for the life of a numerical
>
> > indicator tube are 5000 hours with a continuous display of one character,
>
> > and 30 000 hours when sequentially changing the display from one digit
>
> > to the next every 100 hours or less. The end of life for the above figures 
> > is
>
> > taken to be the time when any character is unable to be covered completely,
>
> > although several more thousand hours would probably have to elapse
>
> > before the character became completely indecipherable. If a tube is
>
> > operated with a bulb temperature below 0"C, the mercury inside the tube
>
> > condenses, resulting in a slight increase in the sputter rate. However, if
>
> > the consequent shortening of life can be tolerated, an operating temperature
>
> > range of -50 to +70"C can be achieved.  "

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to