Although I cannot give you any information re Eagle I would say apart from translating into English leave it as it is. "style more understandable to Western readers" Who does not understand this format?
"numbers noted in a random position when a signal enters / exits the bus" The numbers are in numerical order from each connector, as they SHOULD be. "showing all the connector pins in sequence" No the BUS lines should be in sequence (see above) as they are. "not splitting a single connector onto multiple pieces of the schematic" Not a problem, that's schematics for you, still easy to follow and the ic's functions would NOT normally be put on the schematic (would be difficult as their pin outs are not in 'component' order unless you're planning to rearrange the bus order and make it more difficult to read) If you want to see all the CONNECTOR pins in numerical order then see a wiring diagram. Don't know about anyone else (here) but to me, and I'm in the UK, that is a standard type schematic. I used to build/service electric trains and can show you schematics from British Rail from the 60's/70's right through to today that use the same format. Just a thought Terry but 'Re-invent the wheel' comes to mind, if anyone struggles to read the example schematic they just need to brush up on their digram reading skills. P.s. it WOULD be great in English ;) On Sunday, 15 July 2012 14:55:07 UTC+1, Terry Kennedy wrote: > > I figure it is a long shot, but it never hurts to ask. I've been > thinking about re-drawing the Elektronika 7 family schematics in a > style more understandable to Western readers. This will involve (at a > minimum) not splitting a single connector onto multiple pieces of the > schematic, showing all the connector pins in sequence on the > schematic, clarifying when a bus is used (right now, it is a line the > same width as a single connection with numbers noted in a random > position when a signal enters / exits the bus), showing Western ground > and +V symbols instead of just labeling wire ends A abd B. And of > course, I'd change all of the comments and notes to English, leaving > only the part numbers in Russian. > > K176 databook here: http://www.tmk.com/transient/k176-data.pdf > A typical "problem" schematic: > http://www.tmk.com/blog/elektronika-schematic.jpg > > Has anyone ever tried this before, and maybe has some leftover > libraries that would help? > > If I get that far, I could also use a library with IV-6, IV-26 (type > 1, 2, and 3), and IV-17. But I could create those myself - it is the > work of getting the ICs and their functions in that I'd rather not > repeat if it is available. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/90jEfMfOg90J. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
