Even if somewhere between 79% and 96% would still be a good result!
Michel
on Jan 08, 2013, Jeff Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
On Monday, January 7, 2013 2:44:09 PM UTC-7, Michel wrote:Hello Folks,
While experimenting with an IN-13 bargraph tube I thought it would be
interesting to connect it up to my nixie watch HV supply and see how
far the bar would go. Since the voltage of the tube is lower than the
nixie tubes, the nixies won't light up when the bar graph tube is
wired parallel to the HV (as expected). This means all the current
from the HV supply goes through this bar graph tube and make it very
easy to measure the HV efficiency.
The drawn battery current is 130mA; battery voltage 3.37V. The average
HV supply is 112V and average tube current 3.1mA this would result in
a 79% efficiency.
However, you can only use the average values if either the tube
voltage or tube current is constant; in my case this is not so. So I
would say I need to use the RMS values of tube voltage and tube
current. If I measure these with a scope, I come to 113V RMS and
3.73mA RMS. This would then result in a 96% efficiency!!!
This measuring must be correct, right?
Michel
Hi Michel, if you're using a SEPIC for HV generation, then the calculated efficiency is plausible.
A transformer design could only achieve 80%, or perhaps a little better well tuned.
Regards, Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/ioFfr6XdJPMJ.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
- [neonixie-l] SMPSU efficiency Michel
- [neonixie-l] Re: SMPSU efficiency Jeff Thomas
- Re: [neonixie-l] SMPSU efficiency Michel van der Meij
- Re: [neonixie-l] SMPSU efficiency John Rehwinkel
- Re: [neonixie-l] SMPSU efficiency Michel van der Meij
- Re: [neonixie-l] SMPSU efficiency Michel van der Meij
Reply via email to
