Hi John, Can you mail me as schema and eventual obligatory information ?
Want to build one for a grandchild. eric -----Original Message----- From: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Rehwinkel Sent: donderdag 7 maart 2013 18:09 To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: NL7094 is a myth! >SNAP< I actually used that knowledge recently while building a vacuum tube visual theremin. I was lifting Bob Moog's version of Theremin's circuit, but didn't have the tapped inductors required, nor did I feel like winding them myself. It was a simple Hartley oscillator, so I rearranged it into a Colpitts configuration, which needs two capacitors instead of a tapped inductor. Better yet, I can easily make one or both of the capacitors variable, as this is a high-inductance, low-capacitance implementation. Worked a treat. > However, with that being said, I very much approve of the FCC's move to make it easier to obtain a license for the casually interested engineer. They even release the test questions (and answers!) ahead of time. At $10/10 years, I maintain that amateur radio licensing is the current best deal available from the US government. >SNAP< - John KG4L -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
